In a surprising move Actor Corey Feldman was informed of alleged former Illuminati member Jessie Czebotar regarding statements she made about him in one of her affidavits. He denies all claims against him as seen in the screenshot above.
This is the first time someone well known has confronted claims made by Czebotar, in one of her affidavits, against them.
Read all about it in the extended X link below:
Christian Chaplain Follows Occultists Online
Jessie Czebotar Study’s Medicine
The Fooling of David Nino Rodriguez
Jessie Czebotar Caught In A Lie
Christian Chaplain Follows Occultists Online
Jessie Czebotar Claims to Know the Antichrist’s Name!
Jessie Czebotar Dodged a Subpoena
Jessie Czebotar Presents A False teaching
Here is an example of what I mentioned earlier regarding false info in Jessie Czebotar's affidavits. In "LAW ENFORCEMENT GUT PEOPLE ALIVE"she describes her alleged eye witness killing of Lucien Greaves’ (Douglas Misicko) parents and sister by the satanic cabal in 1981. This is false. His father Thomas passed away in 2021. His mother Sylvia and sister Cathy are still alive and listed in the OB. Also, all three of their first names are wrong, as was the first name of his younger brother (Greg). She only got Douglas’ name correct in her account of this incident.
She renames everybody else: Parents, Todd (Kilrush) and Sarah. Siblings, Peter and Alice. She also has the spelling of the surnames wrong (Mysecko) on all of them.
As I have said often, I have yet to watch a Jessie Czebotar video in which she has not told a lie. Her penchant for deceiving her followers knows no boundaries or is limited by moral conscience. I’ve documented this many times in my blog Outward Trends. Her fanbase never seems to notice or care this deception is being done to them. Her followers on Twitter continue to grow, their love steady like that from a lover blinded by devotion, oblivious to betrayal.
Over time, she has begun to manifest contradictions and holes in her backstories. For example, earlier in 2022 from a video with Carmen Studer Jessie tells the story of attending medical school. However, in another video with host Adena Hodges at Testimony Mountain she provides the tale again with added modifications and missing parts from the previous outing.
As can be determined at this juncture, Jessie Czebotar has only attended two colleges. Crown College in Saint Bonifacius, MN and Multnomah College in Portland, OR. Both are Christian schools oriented towards ministry.
Of the two, only Crown College offers pre-med and nursing.
She is only claiming one degree, a Masters in Divinity which she obtained in 2010 from Multnomah College. To enter med school it requires an undergraduate degree. Then an exam at a medical college which must be passed before actually starting medical school training.
This story already has a multitude of problems. In the middle of all the schooling is getting married and giving birth to six children. One would think this task is driven and time consuming enough. The medical training would have to be jammed in there somewhere, but never clearly defined where.
In the Carmen Studer video she claimed a scholarship for her work in “cloning and DNA” and another one from future CIA director John Brennan in order to finance studying medicine. She then tells of a run-in with a professor for giving the wrong test in the advanced biology class where eventually she and all 400 students were flunked out and all were given tutors.
In the Testimony Mountain video she casts aside the cloning story and now states she was interested in animals and was taking veterinary courses (not provided by the two colleges she attended), in which she successfully operated on a pig cadaver’s knee and did such a remarkable job her professor told her she would make a good heart surgeon. She repeats the incident of the professor run-in but omits the financing for the medical school. The professor and medical school are still unnamed and no time period is specified. The work in cloning and genetics is switched out in favor of cutting on pig cadavers. The various scholarships are missing. And having a future CIA director providing one of those scholarships is a tall tale indeed (which she can now deny with the Studer video being removed).
Regarding Crown College, what degree, if any she achieved there, is unknown. She did attend Multnomah College once and a second time was a teacher’s assistant there. Probably working on her masters there during this time?
Eventually, she feels led by God to pass on being a surgeon, and more inclined to enter ministry.
Since these stories of hers are contradicting I think it is safe to assume medical school is a fabrication since she can tell the story at least twice (maybe more) but can’t ever name the school. She also claimed to have a run-in with a professor there, also unnamed. It’s a bad sign.
Video link showing Jessie Czebotar telling both accounts. Which one is true? Mostly likely neither. Not to mention all of the other unfounded accusations in the video clips.
Early on when they approached me they were obviously using computer generated images of women. They don’t have the look of actual photographs and something always seems off. I started out in 3D rendering with the Commodore Amiga in the mid-80’s so I can spot a fake swiftly. And these early images were so badly done it just about defeats the purpose of trying to snag someone with these images. I would offer that some men probably were. Some guys can’t get past a pretty face. Having been a stock photographer I noticed quickly that something wasn’t right. Such as the backgrounds lacking the proper depth-of-field (background blur) and the general look of exquisite perfection among the models. Who has skin like this? All CGI models look perfect as do the environments they are placed in. They are of one race, no others.
For more and image examples please go to my Substack post:
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgebailey/p/the-age-of-digital-women
Latest post at Substack regarding NASA faking space images.
"Fast forward to 2024 and the CGI has gotten to the point of hyper-realism as seen in such films such as The Lord of Rings, Avatar, and a host of sci-fi films and TV shows. Having a background in photography and CGI I think I am well versed in spotting what is real and what is not. And much coming out of NASA and the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) of late is obviously fake. Have you seen the NASA image of North America much larger than its actual size? Or of North America totally in green with no desert areas or snow capped mountains? It’s all out there. I fail to understand why with the sophistication of cameras and software to transmit pictures back to earth, they would resort to this nonsense."
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgebailey/p/nasa-space-images-are-often-faked
Although I have already written an article on NASA’s jet pack (LINK), I decided to do a video presentation on it since it is one of NASA’s biggest PR stunts.
Video
Updated for Substack. Originally posted at Outward Trends in 2022.
Apollo photo irregularities remain.
Quite a bit of debate has surrounded the numerous photo collections of the Apollo moon missions. From the parallel shadow angles to John Young’s jump salute showing dust from the rear video angle but no dust in front still photo angle. Much has been revealed in professional photographer Jack White’s Apollo photo study (link below) and it is highly recommended to check out his work.
One thing that has caught my attention outside of Jack’s comprehensive examination, was the images shot of the earth from the moon’s surface. If there is any fakery being done, it is quite evident in the earth photos since they are in the wrong position from the moon’s angle of view.
What is wrong with the picture above? This earth shot was from the Apollo 17 mission. They landed 20 degrees from the moon’s equator. The earth’s angle is about 45 degrees from the horizon. However, that is the wrong location. Since there is no earth rise or earth set, as it lies in a fixed position. It should have been directly overhead. A difficult shot to make with a chest mounted camera with no viewfinder. The Hasselblad camera would have to be removed from its chest mount and pointed vertically with the hope it appeared in-frame for the shot.
But there are other problems too. Such as the size of the earth. It appears smaller in size than when looking at the moon from earth. The earth is 3.7 times larger and the distance is the same. It should be much larger. In fact, it’s actually smaller in size than what one would observe of the moon from earth!
In the other picture shot during the Apollo 17 mission which features the flag, the earth is at an even higher angle and even smaller than the other image. But as stated above, the earth is stationary in the moon's sky.
So the earth is in the wrong position in both images and too small in size as seen from the moon’s surface. Astronomers have to know this is incorrect. Have any of them come forward? No. They know what abuse will be heaped on them if they point this out. Nobody wants to go through their professional life as a “toil foil hat” wearer.
And besides that, how come the Apollo era earth photos never show the aurora borealis? It’s been active every day since the earth began. But we never see any images of it from space till the Space Shuttle program and the International Space Station (ISS) commenced. Why? What were they really doing up there?
Even this picture of the crescent earth has issues. Where are the city lights? Once again, no northern lights either.
As astronaut Dr. Brian O’Leary said at a UFO conference in 1999, “If some of the film was spoiled, it’s remotely possible they [NASA] may have shot some scenes in a studio environment to avoid embarrassment.”
An amazing admission! According to Dr. O’Leary, the possibility exists that NASA would fake images if the film were ruined. And they may have done just that in the Apollo 17 example provided here. That was always a clear risk of film damage since there was no radiation shielding on the camera body and besides radiation issues, the effects of being in a vacuum can damage film as well. In fact, if they really were on the moon, I fail to see how they did not damage all the film reels shot in such a toxic environment.
In conclusion, they either made it to the moon and the film was damaged and to be reproduced in a studio or else it was all a cold war propaganda stunt.
Also published at my Substack: https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/what-is-wrong-with-this-picture?sd=pf
Sources
Jack White's Apollo Studies
https://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_0.htm
Dr Brian O’Leary
https://www.aulis.com/nasa2.htm
Project Apollo Archive
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums
In Part 1, the Jessie Czebotar affidavits show a consistent flow of errors in notary public stamps, signatures and signature dates. In Part 2, we will explore the content of the affidavits, which are Jessie’s alleged witness stories.
The Content
I will only briefly describe some of the content in these affidavits due to the nightmarish images they invoke and may be triggering for some people. Jessie’s tales could be best described as horror fairy tales. It details unimaginable suffering and the most bizarre one could ever read. That a child could remember all of these garish and traumatic details is highly questionable. People are known to succumb to blackouts as the brain temporarily shuts down from the trauma of witnessing these described horrors. It’s called a transom.
There is a litany of horrors from graphic rape and torture scenes range from Hillary Clinton ripping a young girl’s face off and wearing it on her own face as a mask; former president Bush (41) scooping up a live child’s brains and eating them; shipping dead children on iced via the US Mail to cannibalized. Some of these scenes are similar to Jessie’s fetish for horror films, the x-rated depraved ones.
Once again she has her grandmother Clara Church, alleged Mother of Darkness committing ritualistic killings of children with Jessie as witness. 1,000 a month. She never states reporting these atrocities to law enforcement, nor how one has the time to view over 30 kids being killed everyday for weeks and months on end. And the psychological impact would have been enormous. Such as it was for the Russian officer that was tasked with executing the captured Polish officers at the start of WWII. He personally shot 5,000 of them. Then he became 5,001 when he shot himself.
Analysis
Jessie has a habit of taking existing stories and combining them with her own or outright adding them on. Such as did with her story on how she nicknamed CIA officer John Brennan “Boo”. In this tale, she borrowed heavily (and said so) from Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird. Boo Radley lived a few houses down from Scout and in Jessie’s telling so did Brennan, which she alleges is a satanist who would come over to visit her family. So similar in telling, she attaches Boo as a nickname for Brennan in a complete lifting of a fictional story joined together with her own fictional story.
It’s a strange psychological drama. It’s not a normal way to tell of a personal experience. Since John Brennan never lived or worked in Madison, WI during this time period or ever, and was instead working as a CIA officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
So Jessie’s story of witnessing Hillary Clinton ripping a young girl’s face off and wearing it as a mask largely has already been told, yet not proven, from an alleged video on Anthony Weiner’s laptop was secured and seen by NYC police detectives. Which also means the timeline for this is way off. But it’s an example of her borrowing a story, real or not, and adding it to her own narrative.
My main issue with these sworn statements is the long history we have of Jessie lying. From my research and proof I have found and posted here, along with others, it is hard for me to believe any of the horrid tales are true. However, I do consider these things can happen but are hidden away from us and only a select elite, all headed for hell, do this. There is power derived from evil or else no one would participate in it.
As always, where is the proof? It’s all a huge group of stories with no evidence and no corroborating witnesses. These affidavits are supposed to have been sworn under oath. To whom? Where? What date?
Basically, these are a disgusting collection of horror tales from somebody who loves disgusting slasher films.
Military Use of Civilian Affidavits?
Jessie Czebotar reveals she has been spreading her Affidavits about numerous government and military institutions. In particular, the U.S. Army at Fort Campbell.
Submitting affidavits to military courts offers a unique set of problems. Such as, when, where and how? What military court exactly? Where was the location? What time period? What case? This is about as vague as a host of other stories Jessie tells. These affidavits of hers all allege crimes by civilians. A military court tries military personnel only and would only try civilians if they are considered enemy combatants or considered to be aiding and abetting the enemies of the United States. So unless she is a witness to crimes committed by military men or women, there is not much they can do with these documents except forward them to Federal law enforcement. As can be clearly seen, none of these affidavits deal with military people.
Analysis
There is nothing here. Jessie appears to be influenced by the Q movement since it promoted the notion of military involvement in law enforcement issues (i.e., prosecuting pedophiles and supposedly rescuing children). The military is not placing pedophiles on trial in military courts. Sending affidavits to the military would be a useless enterprise and we only have Jessie’s word she did so. If she had been working with an attorney, he would have told her to knock it off.
It’s Douglas Misicko It’s Not Douglas Mysecko
Douglas Misicko is a man of many names. Well known for his alias of Lucien Greaves and his other alias Doug Mesner, he is the co-founder of The Satanic Temple in the United States with other branches overseas.
He features a long history of using the internet and social media to attack, insult and mock SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse) survivors. That is why it is such an odd pairing of Jessie with him in numerous tweets where she allies herself with his agenda which contradicts her own ministry efforts and backstory.
So Greaves-Mesner-Misicko has a spotty past. One could call him a satanic con man and certainly a creepy looking libertine. Whatever he is, he is a maze of contradictions. He portrays himself as a liberal but freely associates with Neo nazis and has designed illustrations for a Neo Nazi publisher. He goes about saying “Hail Satan” while saying that he doesn’t believe the devil really exists. He will pay to attend a conference on SRA so as to write a hit piece on it, only to cancel the check afterward.
Jessie Czebotar and Douglas Misicko do have one thing in common—they both go about sowing confusion.
As Jessie does by using a new alias in her affidavits nobody has heard of before, Douglas Mysecko. Various search engines find nothing on this name. It’s not an unusual trait of Jessie’s to misname things and people, or mispronounce them. She has the habit of misspelling my name when mentioning me. I find it hard to believe this is done by accident by someone with a masters degree. Possibly to avoid lawsuits? (Although she displayed no fear or shame naming James Volpe as a murderer and rapist.)
Nevertheless, it is important that an affidavit be accurate in the stating of facts. Providing the wrong names would mislead an investigation (if one is being conducted) or cause a witness’s testimony, this case hers, to be dismissed.
Veronica Swift in her blog detailing these affidavits uses Mysecko in all references. A common trait of hers is she will quote every word of Jessie as if it came down from the mountaintop etched in stone. Even clear mistakes such as when Jessie said the Mother of Darkness castle was in Germany, when it is in Belgium. (I suspect this may derive from being embedded with Jessie’s ministry when she was, or still is, a member of the SOS Army.)
Analysis
It’s apparent that Douglas Misicko is the actual name for Lucien Greaves. It’s unclear why Jessie continues to word play with incorrect names of people. That includes places and things. Such as pronouncing Glamis Castle as it is spelled but not as the true pronunciation, “Glamz”. Or referring to witch Laurie Cabot as Laurie Cabot Kent. Cabot never refers to the surname of Kent in any of interviews, books, social media, websites, etc. But this doesn’t stop her PR flack, Veronica from repeating this false surname. Hopefully one day, this mystery will be solved.
The Slandering of James P. Volpe
 |
| Former Chief of Police James P. Volpe |
Jessie Czebotar has long been naming famous people and celebrities of being involved with satanism and satanic practices. Dozens of them. Lately, Elon Musk is one of her favorite whipping boys. Hillary Clinton is targeted as a fiendish torturer and murderer of children. So far, nobody has filed a slander or defamation suit against her. Many probably don’t know she exists. Not famous enough? Of course, many famous people are rumored to be involved with the Dark Arts and some will openly admit to it.
However, I believe this is the first time Jessie names someone not famous. In this instance retired Wheaton, Illinois Chief of Police James P. Volpe. Originally Jessie did not name him in her stories but finally did in her affidavit release. In her affidavit statements she accuses him of murder, child rape and murder of the girl’s parents. Two of their sons were spared, one of whom she identifies as Douglas Mysecko (Misicko).
This is the definition of slander:
n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications.
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
Placed in bold is malicious intent, which in this case is clearly evident. I am surprised that Jessie would take the path. Is she this confident in being able to back up her assertion that James Volpe is a murderer and rapist? If not, it’s a dumb play and could lead to the ruination of her ministry and reputation among her followers. All it needs is a challenge in court.
By all accounts, James Volpe served his community faithfully. There is no hint of wrongdoing or issues regarding his work as a police officer before rising to chief or after. Before entering law enforcement, he earned a bachelor of science degree in education from Illinois State University in 1980 and juris doctorate (JD) at DePaul University Law School in 1992.
Analysis
The making of wild claims with malicious intent towards others, great and small, should alarm many. Nothing Jessie says good, ill, or false affects her supporters. They would believe her if she said the earth was flat. However, someone personally affected by this would have little recourse but to take legal measures to task. Perhaps Volpe is as ignorant of his character being defamed as Elon Musk and a host of famous people are.
Lastly
As demonstrated in Part 1, there are gross errors in the signatures and notary public stamps. The signatures and notary stamps have the uniform appearance of being digital copies. Many of the signature dates are off by a day or two, meaning the notary public was not witnessing the signing taking place. This brings into question the legitimacy of the documents. This should raise concern with any Judge viewing them.
The so-called eye witness reports by Jessie Czebotar involving horrific torture, rape and murder of children in satanic rituals are still just her accounts. There is a growing amount of evidence and witness testimony that these horrors occur. But ultimately we are left with one person’s story who has a substantial record of lying. Take it with a grain of salt.
And apparently, the starry-eyed Jessie follower above did not and considers the affidavits, shown now replete with flaws, to be almost as great as the Holy Bible. It’s an alarming development of extreme deception with an uncertain solution.
Notes
10.29.22
1) Jessie Czebotar’s affidavits were allegedly escrowed by Randi Erickson a former “Truth and Taxation” judge, in U.S. courts in Minnesota and the U.S. Army at Fort Campbell (others include the governor of Texas and other law enforcement agencies). I have found no evidence of this type of judge. Appears to be Sovereign Citizen nonsense. There is embedded in many state taxing authorities a “Truth-in-Taxation” procedure for doing hearings of annual budgets for the upcoming year.
Also, found no evidence these affidavits were actually filed.
2) In July of 2022, Jessie said the total number of children she witnessed being killed was 136,000 (and counting them from age 4 1/2). This number is left out of her affidavit releases all dated to the year 2021. Why? She still states her grandmother’s sacrificing of 1,000 children a month.
3) Lists numerous places where children are either kept or placed in ritual situations and killed. Which included everything from St Mary by the Sea Catholic Church, the Vapor Voo Doo E-Cig shop to the Carlsbad Observatory. Keep in mind these are stories. She can say whatever she likes she has no real proof for any of these places being used by the Luciferian Brotherhood or that children are being killed there.
Sources
Affidavits Part 1
https://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-affidavits-part-1.html
Jessie Czebotar Affidavits
https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/every-jessie-czebotar-affidavit/
#10 Release
https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2022/10/10/jessie-czebotar-affidavit-release-10/
Tillamook and Carlsbad
https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2022/09/14/tillamook-and-carlsbad/
James F. Volpe alleged crimes
https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2022/08/21/james-f-volpe/
James F. Volpe Bio
Notary Public
https://www.superiornotaryservices.com/blog/notary-public-witness/
Military trials and courts
https://www.lawsuitlegal.com/military-law/can-civilians-be-tried-in-military-court.php
ISSTD
https://www.isst-d.org/about-isstd/
Lucien Greaves aka Doug Mesner aka Douglas Misicko:
The Frontman: Douglas Misicko, better known as Lucien Greaves and Doug Mesner
Douglas Misicko alias Douglas Mesner Information
https://neilbrick.com/articles/douglas-misicko-alias-douglas-mesner/
https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/douglas-misicko-alias-douglas-mesner-update/
Laurie Cabot website
Legal definition of slander
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/slander
Truth-in-Taxation
https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/truth-taxation