The Right Stuff Never Stumbles
This is probably the clincher for the moon missions not being what we were told. I had thought I found “smoking guns” in the past but this one is impossible to explain except via deception.
The space tourists. After studying their accounts, I discovered that upon landing and after spending more than 10 days in space none of them could walk. They had to helped out the capsule, put in chairs and carted off the field to a medical tent where nurses helped them get out of the spacesuits. Digging deeper into the Russian cosmonauts and their space experiences, the same is true for them. Why? Because the human body is designed for gravity. Muscles need resistance. In zero gravity there is none and muscles loose their tone. The body’s muscles, bone and blood degrades. After being in space, even as little as 5 days, astronauts feel as if they are too heavy to move. Their legs feel like tree trunks. In 24 hours after landing everything returns to normal, though some astronauts do have lingering issues and require therapy.
What is striking is the Gemini and Apollo astronauts. In photographs and film they have no problem walking around on the carrier deck after being picked up at sea. In the longest mission of 1965, Jim Lovell and Frank Borman spent 2 weeks aboard Gemini 7 in orbit. Images show them happily walking about the deck after splashdown. All of the Apollo astronauts after their time in space also display no problem walking moments after reentry.
What we see in these images and films of the astronauts is something that is physically impossible.
This is a major indicator that these astronauts were not in space as long as they said they were. How can this be resolved? Unless NASA developed artificial gravity technology for these missions and it secret until now, which is doubtful, we are witnessing fakery.
NASA Document Implies No Go To Moon
Probably my biggest find of the year was a NASA document found on their technical report server, analyzing the history of radiation exposure to American astronauts from the early days of Mercury to the current era of the International Space Station (ISS).
Included in the report is a chart. It shows the radiation exposure from Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Space Shuttle and finally, the ISS. Incredibly, Apollo, the only manned mission that went the farthest out, is not at the top of the chart. The International Space Station is! Apollo is nestled in the middle right by the Space Shuttle. The Shuttle never left low earth orbit (LEO). So the authors of the report are suggesting that the total radiation exposure for all Apollo missions was the same as being in LEO. But this can’t be possible if Apollo went to the moon and back because they left the earth’s protective magnetosphere. Not to mention the hazards of flying thru the Van Allen belts and the moon itself, which is a highly radiative place. They must have the highest exposure if they went to the moon. Yet they place the ISS at the top of the chart for exposure.
So if Apollo’s exposure to high levels of radiation in deep space is equivalent to LEO, they ever had shielding that is a made of classified materials, secret to this day, or they didn’t complete the mission.
Clavious Is A Spook Site
Actually, I should have defined Clavious as a propaganda site. It can still be on the Spook side with articles written by no-names, no copyrights and no sources. This neatly laid out debunking site directed at the NASA moon hoax crowd uses the same techniques found in good disinformation projects. They do what the players at Snopes do—only provide the right amount of information to prove a point and ignore any issues or evidence that contradict. Like Snopes, it all reads good and the explanations seem plausible till you dig a bit deeper. With no sources to expand upon, it is as if they have no need to prove anything. Take our word for it and move along!
A good example of this is Clavious’s explanation regarding how astronauts could survive getting thru the Van Allen radiation belts. They use the common and seemingly sensible theory of using a 30° trajectory that would send the spacecraft thru the outer fringes of the belts, lessening the radiation impact on the astronauts. Sounds feasible till you start looking around for NASA documents to prove this. If they used a 30° trajectory, which launch would that be? All of them? It is never stated. What is the source document for this? Not stated.
I dug around and found a document for the launch trajectory for Apollo 14. It stated an apogee of 90°. I don’t know if this is similar for all of the launches. But what this report does prove is they are not skirting around the edges of radiation belts, but instead flying straight thru them.
Additionally, Frank Borman stated as much in his book, Countdown, that Apollo 8 traveled straight thru the belts and the crew only got a radiation dose equivalent to a chest x-ray. No fancy flying there! And no harm done from the alleged radiation danger which Borman wrote off as much to do about nothing.
Did the damaged Apollo 13 and crew limp home thru the edges of the Van Allen belts? No. They did a slingshot trajectory and headed straight home through the belts. They didn’t have the fuel to do anything more except get home alive.
Ultimately, Clavious comes off as well organized and reasonable with seemingly excellent rebuttals to Moon Hoaxers. That is, till one explores the subject in more detail. But if NASA really succeeded in sending a man to the moon, why not rebuff the critics with real data and not unsourced made-up commentary?
The Mystery of Apollo 13
And a mystery it is. One of the mysteries was why did James Lovell, commander of the mission write in his book that the Command Service Module (CSM) weighed 64,000 pounds in zero gravity? And that the weight was throwing off the “center of gravity” messing up the guidance system? The only reviewer of this book on Amazon to point this nonsense out is me. Do people not think anymore?
To compound the Lovell’s weird narrative regarding this disaster that nearly killed him and two other men (provided this event actually took place) is NASA’s technical report on the debacle. It lists 13 times fuel or water weighing in quantities of pounds. For example, before they shut down the power in the CSM, they withdrew 14 pounds of water and moved it over the LEM for storage. How did they weigh that in zero G? I’d like to see that scale. Oh, never mind!
Even the electronic schematics are screwy. One diagram lists an output with no input. You have to have the input or else there will be no output! I thought these guys are billed as engineering geniuses? But they can’t properly draw up a wiring diagram?
From Apollo 13 is birthed the NASA “can do” agency myth. The stuff of legend. Even more legendary is how the engineers sussed out what went wrong without being able to examine or test the damaged hardware. Something that would normally take months. Rocket scientists from MIT or Wizards from Hogwarts School of Wizardry?
It should be noted that when our heroes triumphantly appeared on deck of the carrier, once again, they did not have to crawl. No problem walking at all.
Magic Handles And Magic Glass
Once again NASA makes the impossible, possible! In this case, making components that are resistant to heat damage. Both the aluminum handles on the CSM capsule and the glass in the windows far exceed their heat tolerance upon reentry. The handles melting point is at 1,180 degrees Fahrenheit and the glass begins melting at 3,110 degrees Fahrenheit. Reentry temperatures rise as high as 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Yet the handles never melt and no damage ever occurs on the glass windows in all of the Apollo flights. In some pictures the handles look in extraordinary shape considering the high temperatures they were exposed to.
Something like this is a common pattern when investigating NASA. Their achievements border on the mythological. Yet there they are, claiming to have done some nearly miraculous deed. Such as seen in the top image of President Nixon talking to the astronauts on the moon with a rotary dial phone. The longest distance call ever! What is the area code again? Try to get a mobile phone connection anywhere that is that good today!
Sources and Links
Articles
Other Links
Apollo 14 flight Trajectory
Clavious and the Van Allen belts
