Showing posts with label book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book. Show all posts

Saturday, May 22, 2021

The Picture Does Not Lie

New Methods in Education; Art, Real Manual Training, Nature Study, p73, 1901


I’ve written about the picture before (LINK), the one in which Jessie Czebotar claims to be with two other girls drawing pentagrams.  It was supposed to be part of her training to be a leading member of the Illuminati.  An online researcher Barbara Roberts was the first to post on Twitter the alternate version of the image, the one above, showing girls drawing circles on a blackboard, without pentagrams.  It was an image published in an educational art instruction manual in 1901.

It was the beginning of my belief that Jessie was a fraud.  She uses this image a lot and in two video interviews on May 14, she backtracked a bit saying she had a distant childhood memory of being in a similar photograph, dressed in turn of the century period clothes..


Digging in I found this book was in publication as a reprint and ordered it at Amazon.  It arrived recently and as I and others have suspected it’s three girls drawing circles.  Just as in the online image scan.


The images are rough.  The press plates are long gone and the book had to be scanned.  Scanning printed halftones are hard, hence the graininess and washed out highlights and contrast.  However, enough detail remains to show there are no pentagrams in the image.





Jessie has said she ordered copies of the pages involving the image from the Library of Congress.  But she has never shown scans of the pages, suggesting that others can do this as well and compare them to what she has. Only she has never released her copies.  As can be seen in the image above, my reissue has the LOC stamp and 1901 printed on the copyright page.  Jessie would have to know this as well, hence her never showing her copies since she knows the pictures she has do not show pentagrams.


In Closing

So there you have it.  It turns out to be a dumb stunt.  As if nobody was ever going to find the original source picture?  Jessie Czebotar’s claim of being in this picture is obviously false.  It’s too old, the castle she mentions does not exist and the alleged photographer Cisco Wheeler was yet to be born when the photo was taken. If you don’t believe it just order a copy from Amazon.


Of course this will not settle it for Jessie’s growing band of followers who have gotten increasingly agitated with my blog posts and other researchers who are calling her out on Twitter.  They believe no criticism of Jessie is valid and attack critics as haters, liars, mockers, etc. Their behavior is cultish and they are getting more aggressive and making hints of violence and spiritual annihilation as this tweet shows:  




Beware your idols.  They ultimately fail.


Notes

It should be noted that the reprinted version published in 2015 had some layout changes.  For example the image of the girls is on the left hand page; in the original from 1901 the images are on the right hand page.  Nevertheless, the page number, illustration number and image are the same.  As already stated, if you believe this is in error, buy your own copy from the link below.  You are always going to get a picture of three girls drawing circles from the turn of the last century.


5.24.21

There is a notion that this was intentionally done.  Luciferians and for that matter, intel operators are masters at spy craft, diversion, miss direction and adding in a dose of lying, mocking, and side talk into absurd accusations.  Just read the Twitter thread with Barbara Roberts debating these people.  One of Jessie’s flunkies used a picture that clearly wasn’t the one with the three girls in it.  They want to you to respond to a preposterous claim, a method of wearing down the debater in rubbish.  Which Barbara responded to, which is what they want. 




6.12.21

For over a year now Jessie has been saying she was in the 1901 photo drawing a pentagram with two other girls.  Now in a surprising turn around, she is claiming her critics are “falsely claiming” she drew the images.  Amazing!  It's another lie.  Just see the picture above where she claims to be the middle girl in the picture.  And more than once, as she has been leaving a digital Twitter trail saying she was drawing them!  She uses the picture in all of her media.  Notice the misuse of pentagram as “pentacales,” which is misspelled but means pentagram.  


7.30.21

Keep in mind there is more than one falsehood going on with the picture. In her lengthy article Veronica Swift ignores numerous falsehoods attributed by Jessie.  One, the Laurie Cabot Kent castle does not exist.  Two, Cisco Wheeler did not take the picture.  And three, the pentagrams were added by some unknown graphic artist.  All three issues totally ignored.  And to think she calls Jessie critics bad researchers.


7.31.21

One of my more nastier critics is Veronica Swift.   She is a diehard Jessie supporter.  I have proven many times what a relentless liar Jessie is and apparently, she attracts sycophants such as Veronica to wage propaganda attacks against myself and other critics.  No, I don't engage in opinion only, as she once opined about me. It's not an opinion to state the fact that Somerset Belenoff is an internet hoax and Jessie says she met this woman. Nor is it an opinion to point out that Jessie's decoding of Satanic symbols is a cheeky con job using graphics from the Ghostbusters video game.  


It's interesting how often you can point out contractions, lack of evidence to support claims, outright falsehoods, and the Jessie cult engages in false personal attacks (hater, paid troll, working for the cabal, etc.) ignoring presented facts.  Veronica even went so far in her Twitter feed to suggest ways of influencing Blogspot to suspend my blog for alleged slander.  Typically, these cultists have no understanding of the definition of slander and I have done no such thing.  Free speech for me, but not for thee... 


Obviously troubled, Veronica conducted a deep dive on her blog Lifting the Wool in a piece entitled, Do Pictures Lie?, into the 1901 picture and the surrounding and never ending controversy, i.e., that Jessie was in the picture when it is provable that she is not.  In a very long piece it was fascinating to see the depths she went, and everywhere she traveled she ran into the same wall--the wall that she had been duped with and her inability to resolve it.  It was as if she was digging to find one piece of evidence that would correct and overturn the whole thing--but to no avail.  She failed.  While it is a very well written exploration of this issue, it bears no resolution because the picture is a Jessie fiction.


Veronica Swift's of the world just cannot handle the truth. 


https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2021/05/13/do-photographs-lie/


9.13.21

Now documented by Bishop Larry Gaiters on his YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqGXdm-NWWw






Sources


New Methods in Education; Art, Real Manual Training, Nature Study, 1901, reprint 2015, p 73, ill 46.


https://www.amazon.com/dp/1340042061


Link of online scan

https://archive.org/details/newmethodsineduc02tadd/page/72/mode/2up


My previous posts on the topic of Jessie Czebotar


Red Flags

More Red Flags

Picture Does Not Lie

Jessie Stories

Friday Damage Control

She's Caught Again

The Queen of the Illuminati

Who Really Is Somerset Belenoff

Sunday, July 14, 2019

Book Review: Fashioning Apollo by Nicholas de Monchaux



It’s An Empty Suit


Spacesuit--Fashioning Apollo is one of the most elegant and beautifully designed and printed books available.  It’s a paperback edition but the cover jacket has a smooth, rubberized coating.  It’s a pleasure to hold in one’s hands.  This is an experience that no digital book can ever match.  

Although published in 2011 by M.I.T. Press​,​ the information regarding the NASA spacesuits, with the emphasis on the Apollo suits is relatively up to date.  The author explores the development of spacesuits from the early pressure suits in the 1930’s onward to the space program of the 1960’s.  There is not much to be said in this book regarding spacesuits in the Shuttle era and beyond.  The author Nicholas de Monchaux does provide a good history of suit development for mankind’s reach for the stars.  

Since this book is published by the United States’s most distinguished science and engineering universities I was looking for various technical details that unfortunately, this book does not provide.  And that was the main reason I bought this book in the first place.  It is in fact, more of an easy reading account of spacesuit development for the masses.

Radiation

“NASA’s focus now is on sending humans beyond low-Earth orbit to Mars… We are trying to develop the technologies to get there, it is actually a huge technological challenge. There are a couple of really big issues. For one thing – Radiation. Once you get outside the Earth’s magnetic field we are going to be exposing the astronauts to not just radiation coming from the Sun, but also to cosmic radiation. That's a higher dose than we think humans right now should really get.”

– Dr Ellen Stofan, Chief Scientist, NASA, and principal advisor
to NASA Administrator – BBC Newsnight interview, November 2014

"Astronauts on the lunar surface could in reality be exposed to every kind of radiation – alpha, beta, microwave, x-ray, gamma, Bremsstrahlung, Cherenkov radiation, Askaryan radiation, high-energy protons and neutrons, galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar particle events (SPE)."

LUNAR GEOLOGY AND IONIZING RADIATION from a Revisionist Perspective

– Dr Bulcsu István Siklós


There are many hazards in space once people leave the safety of the protective magnetosphere of the earth and radiation is one of the main hazards.  It’s coming from everywhere and fills the vacuum of space.  There are cosmic galactic rays, gamma rays, x rays, charged protons and neutrons, just to mention a few.  The surface of the moon is basically a nuclear hazmat zone.  Even the famous moon dust is radiative.  That, coupled with extremes of heat and cold in a heavy vacuum, designates the surface of the moon a place where no life could ever exist.

My main interest was discovering the radiation protection in the spacesuits.  As it turned out, the book mentions nothing about it.  There is no documentation of radiation shield development, testing, or anything related.  Even the word “radiation” is not listed in the index.  The fact that 21 layers of various synthetic materials were used and not a single one has a reference to radiation in a book such as this, is a major omission.  On the contrary, it is not mentioned by NASA either.  One would think radiation shielding would be one of the most important aspects of a spacesuit, and it has no bearing in this book.  (It should be noted that the Apollo spacesuit manual, linked below, which can be downloaded from NASA makes no mention of radiation protection in the suit or helmet either.)

It is unconscionable to believe that the astronauts would be placed in such a hazardous environment without protection from one of the main hazards they faced on the surface of the moon--death by high energy particles. 

The multiple layers of insulation for thermal protection are documented, particularly the use of aluminized mylar which is listed for thermal protection.  So at least the astronauts had protection for heat over 200 degrees and cold temperatures of over -200 degrees on the moon.  But the development of this material gets no mention.   How was plastic and a metal bonded together?  How does it work to protect an astronaut?  How was it tested for this purpose?  The reader is never told. ​​Just as the beta cloth covering gets nothing more than a vague mention.

Is radiation shielding in the spacesuits classified?
Apollo spacesuit layers. Radiation shielding not listed. Image courtesy of NASA.


Don’t leave out the helmet!
Yes, it is left out of any mention in relation to spacesuit development and astronaut protection for the moon's hazardous environment.  If one reads the NASA Apollo spacesuit manual, it mentions the helmet being constructed out of polycarbonate.  In other words, plastic.  The visor assembly was polycarbonate as well.  Another fact that Fashioning Apollo makes no mention of since helmet development is ignored.

But the most distressing part of my own research into this matter involves finding that the spacesuit helmet has no thermal or lethal radiation protection of any kind, as so stated in the NASA spacesuit manual.  It does feature a beta cloth covering but that is just flame retardant cloth with fiberglass woven in.  It does not protect from the aforementioned hazards.  To be fair, the gold visor does protect the astronaut’s eyes from damaging ultraviolet rays but those rays are not life threatening.  It can hardly be expected for a thin layer of plastic to protect a person from the harmful radiation and severe heat and cold.  Why put thermal protection in the suit but ignore the helmet?  How the astronauts, if they actually walked on the moon, survived being there is a mystery.  A big enough mystery to strongly question if men actually landed there at all.

Do their heads not matter? 

In closing
There is so much more that could have been written in Fashioning Apollo to round out what the public can know about spacesuits.  The history of development is good but the author often jumps into fashion design of the 1950’s, how television works from the moon, JFK, the flight simulators, artist Robert Rauschenberg’s astronaut prints, and then leaves the reader in the lurch for the good stuff.  The radiation shielding should hold an important place in a book of this kind, but it is never covered.  

What is to be found here?  An empty suit.

Notes
Excellent article at Aulis by Scott Henderson--Apollo Space Suits: Shenanigans and Shortcomings. A must read on the space suit controversy.  

https://www.aulis.com/suits.htm

The Dangers of Space Radiation

LUNAR GEOLOGY AND IONISING RADIATION from a Revisionist Perspective

NASA Apollo Spacesuit manual

Monday, November 26, 2018

Center of Gravity In No Gravity

The damage on the Apollo 13 service module.  

(Updated at https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/center-of-gravity-in-no-gravity)


NASA once again makes the impossible, possible.


The near loss of three astronauts in the Apollo 13 disaster is probably one of the most dramatic events in the history of the moon landings.  It was NASA’s finest moment as the “can do agency” to get those astronauts home safely.  A closer look brings up lots of anomalies  and unanswered questions.

 By now we know the story and the movie.  The public’s interest was waning as the moon landings got too routine.  Then in 1970, Apollo 13 on its way to the moon, suffered an oxygen tank blow on the command module and the three astronauts, James Lovell, Jack Swigert and Fred Haise had a life or death situation on their hands because the tank explosion also ruined the power systems and ended any chance of accomplishing a landing.  The LM (lunar landing module), still in perfect working order, became the lifeboat and the means of arriving home.  Any problems that ensued the wunderkinds at NASA came to the rescue.  Of note, the jury-rigged carbon dioxide filter that could have ended the astronaut’s lives simply by exhaling.  Good thing they had duct tape onboard!

Jim Lovell’s Book
It’s probably best to go to the source.  Jim Lovell’s book, with co-author Jeffery Kluger, Apollo 13 published in 2000 for the 30th anniversary of the mission, is the recent version of Lost Moon, published in 1994.  It’s a gripping read and well written but filled with peculiarities and scientific oddities that Lovell should have addressed and corrected. 

The strangest part of the book is the constant use of weight as a measurement system.  For example, on page 123, it is stated that the fuel cells were pressurized at 300 pounds per square inch and one of the damaged oxygen tanks was leaking, and eventually, 218 pounds of oxygen would bleed off.  (Page 104 lists 320 pounds of oxygen in the tank before the damage took place.) 

My word, that 1960’s NASA technology is amazing!  Only they could have a tank holding over 200 pounds of oxygen in zero gravity!  I fail to understand how this is possible or how weight such as this, could be measured in a gravity free environment.  Perhaps they used some other method of measuring the volume in the tank?  There is the other issue of pressuring tanks at “pounds per square inch” or PSI, which is a pressure system based on gravity—pounds equals weight.   How does that translate to zero G?   It is common knowledge that in zero gravity everything weighs nothing. If you read the reviews of the book on Amazon, most of which offer high praise, nobody ever points this out. 

This weight issue drives through many of the areas of this Apollo 13 account, as well as many other books by the other astronauts. 

In another example, after the explosion, Jim Lovell had a hard time at first keeping both spacecraft's attitude in proper alignment.  The reason given on page 148 is that the added “weight” of the command module, coming in at 63,400 pounds, was causing the problem.  I kid you not!  It was actually stated that the attached command module was throwing off “the center of gravity” of the ships.   As if there is a center of gravity in no gravity!  Please note this is not an issue on a normal mission when the command module is in control and LEM is docked and not being used to transit to the moon.  But suddenly there is a problem with a dead command module.

And they don’t stop there.  Later, NASA had the backup astronauts test various strategies in the flight simulators, such as piloting the LM with the added “weight” of the command module docked (p. 225).  Again, what weight?  Why is this irrelevant and time wasting exercise?

They are in zero gravity, everything weighs nothing.  And not a single reviewer of this book on Amazon has an issue with this.  

Obviously, I have no background in astrophysics.  But what is written in this account of the Apollo disaster makes no relative sense.  The authors are saying that weight in zero gravity exists and is producing an influence on many spacecraft systems from fuel tanks to flight attitude control.  (This carries over to the Apollo 13 Mission Report, link below, that states at launch there was 338 pounds of water in the LM.  At the end there was 50 pounds left.  Where is the weight coming from? How would they possibly measure it?  Even NASA, it seems, is into this weight in zero gravity nonsense.)

They are in zero gravity, everything weighs nothing.  And not a single reviewer of this book on Amazon has an issue with this.  

Perhaps this account of Apollo 13 is a book written in a dumbed down fashion, so the average person could enjoy the narrative and the heroics and not get bogged down in technical details.   And it should be noted that there are various technical facts that are omitted.  One may research elsewhere online to uncover those details.  

Did this dramatic event actually happen?

Addendum  3.3.19


Added to the links below is the Apollo 13 Mission Report.  Some of it is at odds with Jim Lovell’s book.  


Sources

Apollo 13, Jim Lovell with Jeffery Kluger, Houghton Milfflen Company, 2000.

Center of gravity, center of mass

https://study.com/academy/lesson/understanding-the-center-of-mass-center-of-gravity.html

Apollo 13 Mission report

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a13/A13_MissionReport.pdf

Friday, July 24, 2015

The State of Apocalyptic Fiction


Nothing like impending doom and the destruction of civilization to make for entertaining reading, movies, video games and TV shows.  It's a popular brand of fiction that has been around a long time.  Probably the earliest example is Mary Shelley's The Last Man, published in 1824.  Since then there has been a steady stream of apocalyptic literature:  The Stand, Lucifer’s Hammer, A Canticle For Leibowitz, I Am Legend, On The Beach, One Year After, The Drowned World, Alas Babylon, The Postman, The Hunger Games, Divergent–the list is endless.

And why this fascination?  It's apparently a popular form of fiction as new novels on this subject are cranked out just about every year.  Rather than speculate about other readers I'll talk about my interest.  For me, it's interesting to see a different way of living.  Sort of a return to the old ways of life without indoor plumbing, electricity, speedy travel and communication, refrigeration, internet...all the things that enhance and add comfort to our lives.  It's observing how the good people maintain order without creating a police state.  It's also about scrutinizing human nature and seeing how quickly normal, law abiding people quickly turn to their baser instincts.  And it's not a myth–one can see the breakdown occurring at most natural disasters or the aftermath of war.  Most authors of the apocalypse generally get this right.  

Of course it's a world none of us would want to live in.  Unless you are a survivalist loner.  Constantly searching for food, or trying to harvest it from a poisoned landscape would indeed be a hardscrabble life and one not long lived.  Constantly looking over your shoulder for possible attacks or robberies; continually having to defend what you possess; dealing with health emergencies with little or no medical treatment available; burying family and friends as they die in the aftermath of total ruination.  My main interest is seeing how people cope with all of this hardship and get through it.  I suspect that is the main interest of the authors writing such stories.  Let us all hope and pray it never happens. 

What follows is a run down of some of the apocalyptic novels I read and my comments on them.  It's not meant to be the best of, and it is by no means final; I'll add more books to the collection in time.  So stop back in the future for updates.

The Stand by Stephen King
One Apocalyptic Novel to Rule Them All

Stephen King once remarked how dismayed he was that so many people told him how The Stand was their favorite novel, despite all of the best sellers he's churned out over the past 30 years.  Nevertheless, The Stand is epic storytelling featuring the age-old conflict between the forces of good and the forces of evil in the aftermath of a weaponized flu outbreak and it never gets any better than this.  Featuring great characters such as the Godly Mother Abigail to the creepy demonic Randall Flagg, the narrative is as big as the landscape stretching from the northeastern area of the USA, across the rocky mountains, to the desert sands of Nevada.  It is to King's talent as a fiction author that he breathes so much life into his characters and the story itself.  He can make the supernatural seem natural. 

It's King's biggest novel, at ​over ​1,200 pages and is good to the last drop. Published in 1978 it was updated with additional narrative in 1990.  If you have not read it I recommend the later version.  King has been criticized for unsatisfying endings.  He almost did it in The Stand but managed to pull it off at the end.  One thing that always interested me about the story is how the evil and seemingly undefeatable Randall Flagg gathers an army of misfits, losers, and social outcasts to his side but in the end, they are ultimately his undoing.  And how fitting is that? 

Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel
The Woke Version of Apocalypse

This novel could also be dubbed the "chick-lit" version of the apocalypse as well. The story starts out promising enough about a troupe of post-apocalypse Shakespearean actors traveling to and fro among isolated communities presenting the plays of the great Bard.  It's a cool idea really, and an interesting take on this genre of fiction.  But ultimately, it bogs down on the weight of the author's own pretentious and misdirected thematic direction.

One of the characters, a famous actor, dies early on before the killer flu breaks out and his life is revisited in flashbacks throughout the story.  Why, I have no idea since he must be one of the most boring literary figures to ever appear in print.  What a waste of paper! One of the characters keeps a scrapbook of clippings on this man.  What on earth is it?  Is the post-apocalyptic world this dull?  It is in this version of the world's end.

The second issue is the title of the book, drawn from a graphic novel of the same name.  Oh how cool!  I kid.  Some of the characters obsess over it.  I never understood what was so special about this comic book or why any of the characters cared about it.  It seems to have no relevance to the plot and it's not a guide to where anybody needs to go.  When a central object is a ring, a sword, or whatever, it forms in the mind's eye more clearly and carries the weight and purpose of the narrative.  Describing printed graphics is off-putting and it's hard to visualize what the art really looks like and what impact it is supposed to have.

And finally all the agendas.  The females are strong, decisive, intelligent and virtuous.  The men are a bunch of spineless sissies who blunder about like a bunch of dullards being outwitted and led by the highly intelligent and resourceful women.  What a poor specimen of manliness they all are.  They resemble a bunch of trendy metrosexuals.  The only remotely strong male figures are the bad guys but like the other men in the story the females outwit them.  Anyway, this is all part of the modernist writers and their rearranging of gender roles in making women appear almost superhuman or god-like.  Strong female characters are great!  But come on, we need a reasonable balance here.  

Overall...promising but not enough post-apocalypse story telling that quickly fades into a bore of things better left alone.

One Second After by William R. Forstchen
EMP Apocalypse

One lady in this t​ome​ remarks, "Sometimes I feel like a character in a bad novel."  Sorry to inform you dear Character, but this is your eternal home!  Let that line be a good example of what you aspiring writers out there should never use in a story.  It might blow back on you!  While the highly educated William R. Forstchen may be well versed in the technology involving an EMP attack, which fries all electronics and sends the modern world back to the dark ages, fiction writing is apparently not his forte.  It's an example of how career flipping sometimes fails and one should stick to their chosen field of endeavor.  The story reads like a first novel (which it is not), the one you write to get some experience but have enough good sense to never publish.  His characters are bland–they don't live and breathe. Their dialogue comes off stilted and lacking in natural flow.  And speaking of that, in the tablet version, two characters have a conversation that lasts for around nineteen pages.  Oh my!  I skipped most of that blather and don't feel bad because of it.  

A good book to read about how an EMP works but the rest is typical post apocalyptic battle lore where the barbarians show up for your stuff and your women and you have to kill them all.

One side note...I was really annoyed how he treated my home state of Florida.  It got worse in the disaster with some sort of poisoning of the ocean.  Oh come on!  There are thousands of lakes, ponds, creeks and so on to fish out of, not to mention a steady supply of wild game.  Really, we would survive far better than his characters located in the NC mountains.  Can you farm up there in the winter? ​ ​No, and in fact, it’s hard to farm at all in the mountains.  Here, we can grow vegetables and fruit all year long.  Abundant game, livestock, fish in the waterways...it’s the author’s biggest goof.

World War Z by Max Brooks
Zombie Apocalypse!

Haven't we had our fill of zombies?  Not by a long shot!  Zombies have come to possess our fears of future ruination with a touch of horrible bizarreness.  They pop up all over the place in popular culture from movies, TV shows, comic books, video games, to an unending publication of novels.  Like a wave of shuffling zombies it just keeps on coming.

Max Brooks's account of a zombie apocalypse is quite original with a novel that reads basically as a series of after action reports.  No set of characters reappear throughout the story so each report is different.  Brooks documents the ebb and flow of a world wide bizarro zombie conflict in such a realistic manner you have to remind yourself this is fiction, not a history of a real event.  The zombie war features patient zero outbreak, techniques and survival of individuals, military tactics to stave off the undead hordes, the psychological effects on the survivors, and all manner of interesting lore. 

Ultimately, a great entry in the apocalypse genre.

And the movie.  It's just okay.  Stick to the book.

The Dog Stars by Peter Heller
Shooting, Flying and Fornicating in the Post-Apocalypse!

This version of the post-apocalypse comes down to a bunch of gunning, flying and sexing.  The lead character survives the end of the world to fly around in a single engine plane in Colorado with his dog.  How cute!  Dog characters rarely survive in stories like this so shed your tears now.  The lone survivor sets up sniper nests to shoot the bad people when they come up to his house with the porch light on.  Bang!  How is that for the cowardly dispatching of the bad guys?  His ex-army buddy on the other side aides in shooting them too.  The violence charges on with little sympathy for the victims, or guilty conscience among the shooters.  Eventually the sole survivor meets up with a hottie living on the mountainside with her daddy.  Nothing like love among the ruins though you can hardly call this book a post-apocalypse romance novel.  It all ends rather abruptly with the good people surviving at the end but with nowhere to go.  There is no there, there.  Where is the character development?  Where is the big plot reveal?  Who are these people anyway?  I was left wanting more and not getting it.

One thing I did find disappointing, and a bit annoying, is that in the book's Reading Group Guide is a list for other Apocalypse novels to read.  The Stand is not on the list.  That's an offense.  Oh well, all interested readers in this type of fiction know and have most likely read The Stand by now.  At least somebody can write a classic of the form, something that alludes to Mr. Heller.

The Road by Cormac McCarthy
Post Apocalypse Doom and Gloom

Probably the most depressing of apocalypse novels listed here.  The end of the world as we know it doesn't get any darker and grittier than this.  The story involves the travels of a father and his son.  Together, they travel through a ruined landscape of gloomy skies, distant rumblings, bad people, cannibals, and a constant scavenging for food.  McCarthy never tells the reader what the names of the two characters are what caused the end to come.  Despite being the darling of the lit critics, and a hipster of modern prose, McCarthy forgoes quotation marks for his dialogue. How's that for hip prose writing?  It's up to you to suss out who is talking to who.  I guess the old way of doing it is for the throwbacks that still love pecking away at their manual Underwoods.  I'm suspecting that Cormac McCarthy fancies himself some kind of cool dude.  Only too cool for school since he isn't going by the normal literary rules of serve and volley.  Despite all of that independence, he actually won a literary award for his dark story.  

Having said all of that, this novel is high up in the cannon of apocalyptic fiction.  The movie is a very accurate portrayal of the book.  God help us if any of this ever comes true. 

Swan Song by Robert M. McCammon
The Supernatural Apocalypse Mixed with Mad Max

Often compared to King's The Stand and deservedly so.  Also often said, if you like The Stand you'll like this too.  I sure did.  Robert M. McCammon's version of the apocalypse features interesting characters dealing with episodes of supernatural and magical events, warring armies of survivors, and mixed with great hardship for all.  Yes, Swan is a special little girl with supernatural powers to guide them all through the holocaust. (Mmm...I wonder where McCammon got that character sketch from?)  The main plot revolves around three bands of survivors: A shape shifting Randall Flagg type entity in pursuit of a homeless woman with a magical jewel; a former soldier with a whiz kid; and a giant pro wrestler teamed up with Swan.

Robert M. McCammon demonstrates his skill as a very good fiction writer.  His dialogue and pacing is well focused and his characters are fully realized with noticeable personality types, each with their own speech patterns.  He chronicles concise backgrounds on his characters, but not long, rambling bios.  Because of this, the narrative isn't bogged down and the story takes flight at a good pace.  His handling of a nuked out world with adverse weather, bizarre lighting, endless destruction, and dangerous people and animals is very well rendered.  

Highly recommended.

The End by G. Michael Hoff
EMP Apocalypse...Again!

Now there is an appropriate title for an apocalyptic story.  They could all be named that. What G. Michael Hopf does in The End make​s​ One Second After look good. Which also means it's that bad.  

Authors have learned that when approaching a subject of this scale to concentrate their energies on a handful of survivors.  Robert M. McCammon did in Swan Song and so Hopf does here concentrating on his main character, a former Marine with his family; his brother in the Marines overseas; and lastly, a Speaker of the House drafted to be president since DC has gotten nuked and the real president and vice president have been vaporized.  And off the story goes running, with the usual mayhem of societal breakdown after the EMP occurs and modern life comes to a grinding halt.

Probably the worst part of the novel is the main character, Gordon Van Zandt.  The ex-Marine starts out as a tender family man only to quickly turn into a cold blooded killer, shooting unarmed men and then robbing them.  The hero is a sociopath with no remorse where the ends justify the means.  Van Zandt at one point gets a man to surrender by telling him he won't hurt him.  Then shoots him anyway.  How can the reader root for a monster like this?

All writers have their quirks in their writing.  With Hopf, he has the habit of mentioning a character's height when introducing them and most of them are tall.  The men mainly and the women rarely.  It borders on being obsessive and after a while, hilarious.  Apparently the author considers the short characters somehow disadvantaged as if they lost life's lottery on tallness.  However, the author notes that they make up for it with "colorful" personalities, as if the shorties need some kind of redemption.  With every new person introduced I waited for the height report and Hopf never failed to deliver.  Frankly, this displays a tad of amateurism on the author's part.  Too much repetition.  A no-no for professionals.

G. Michael Hopf could easily be the character in the Beatles's tune, Paperback Writer. He has a pot-boiler writing style and one could almost envision him at his Underwood cranking them out. And in fact, he does, since The End (apparently not really the end...) is the first book in the four-book, New America Series.  These are self-published books and this first volume features poor editing, awkward and redundant sentence construction, amateurish dialogue, and minimal character development.  One can hope he got an editor for the following volumes.  A language arts teacher would do nicely as I discovered for my self-published novel. 

I would avoid this one.

I Am Legend by Richard Matheson
Vampire Apocalypse!

Author Richard Matheson proves himself an able writer of prose.  In this account of civilization’s end, a bacterium causes humanity to convert to the classic vampire meme. Matheson creates a plausible vampirism biology which his lead character investigates for a cure.

The hero of the story Robert Neville, must withstand nightly attacks in his fortified house while resisting the urge to give up. Neville is haunted by the loss of his wife and daughter and often turns to drink. This novel is a classic study in isolation and Matheson accurately relates Neville’s loss, pain, and loneliness as he questions his desire to go on amid the chaos of the bizarre world he is cast in.

Once again, the movie starring Will Smith is nothing like the novel.  Hollywood just uses the title. Too bad as the story presented here is so much better than the one they invented for the movie.  Plus, the novel's ending explains what I Am Legend means.

The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins
Femdom Dystopia!

It seems fiction of late with strong female leads just can't get any balance.  Just like Ocean Eleven's modern feminist agenda, Suzanne Collins's Hunger Games trilogy suffers the same fate.  The strong main character, Katniss, is so dominating she could just be called Super Girl with a bow and be done with it.  As per the script, the females are virtuous and brave and the men are either villainous or spineless wimps and cut outs.  The archetype here is: A strong man is an evil man. 

In this post apocalyptic world where what is left of civilization is divided into districts ruled by a central government.  Since food is in short supply a competition is devised to have children and teens fight each other to the death in a nationally televised event to win food for their district.  It's all heavily hyped to the population at large, like a bizarre dystopian version of a Super Bowl game.  The kids, picked by lottery and treated as pampered stars, are trained in combat and weapons and how to murder one another. 

And this trilogy of books is marked as a children's book series!   A totally creepy idea.

The heroine of the story, Katniss, does what nobody else can do–beat a rigged system and out with its software and special effects.  She not only wins but saves a boy she's partnered with, Peeta, who like other spineless males, needs her help to get through it all.  She then goes on to become the leader of a resistance movement.  More bloodshed follows.  Is Suzanne Collins trying to show kids that violence solves problems?  It does in this dark dystopian tale.

Never the less, this best selling trilogy has won critical acclaim from the usual typists in the mainstream media who typically review fiction like this with little regard to moral considerations or the message being sent to young people–a story of morbidity, of torture, and of killing people, even the most innocent, to feed your family.

Really, it reads like ​e​nd ​t​imes fiction until our own real-life End Times dawns on us.

The Dark Tower Series by Stephen King
King invents new literature genre:  Incomprehensible Fantasy

Sprawling through 7 novels is a hodge-podge of every fiction genre one can imagine.  The reader is dragged through the wild west, science fiction, time travel, multiverse travel, horror, fantasy, romance and last but not least, the apocalypse.  The tale rambles on so, it lacks consistency with the mixing of the genres that do not mesh well together.  There is too much blather, drawn out dialogue exchanges and backstory breaks that disrupts the narrative flow.  It appears as if King took on a project a bit out of his ability to properly narrate.  

Stephen King’s Magnum Opus.  This 7 novel series was written over the course of many years of King’s career as the popular horror fiction writer.  Never has a writer of fiction been so indulgent.  I know of no instance in Western literature where the author of a fiction work features himself as a character in the narrative.  He then resorts to including references to his earlier novels and even brings back a few past characters who he then manages to kill off.  One character finds the novel that King has written (Salem’s Lot) that features himself and all of his events in his story.  How weird is that?  This is an example of a writer taking indulgence to the extreme.

Regarding the apocalypse, we are told, “The world has moved on.”  A good catch phrase that could apply to our world now. Too bad as this novel series it is basically a backdrop for the quest of heroes who are out to save “Beams” which we are told hold the world together in harmony.  A world that doesn’t appear to be worth saving but our band of heroes press on regardless even as the Beams fade from relevance.  

The overall quality is spotty, with some novels in the series being good classic King reads and the others not so much. One novel in the set I refused to read has the main character Roland, the gunslinger, telling a story to his band of heroes and while in the middle of that, he meets up with another character along the way and tells a different story to him.  A story within a story!  Meanwhile, the quest of Roland and his band of heroes is delayed to the next book.  Maybe it is just me, but I want to read the story of the quest, not take indulgent side trips like this.  

Lord of the Rings Magnum Opus, it clearly is not.  Stephen is a very good fiction writer.  He deserves his success.  But here, he fails.  This series shows he is not up for something this big.

It’s all about the journey and not the arriving as King states at the end of the final novel, The Dark Tower.  I guess that is his half-ass excuse for the less than satisfactory ending, which he is famous for, and which he did here.


Sources
All books mentioned in this piece are available at Amazon, Barnes&Noble, iTunes iBooks, and Kindle.