 |
| New Methods in Education; Art, Real Manual Training, Nature Study, p73, 1901 |
I’ve written about the picture before (LINK), the one in which Jessie Czebotar claims to be with two other girls drawing pentagrams. It was supposed to be part of her training to be a leading member of the Illuminati. An online researcher Barbara Roberts was the first to post on Twitter the alternate version of the image, the one above, showing girls drawing circles on a blackboard, without pentagrams. It was an image published in an educational art instruction manual in 1901.
It was the beginning of my belief that Jessie was a fraud. She uses this image a lot and in two video interviews on May 14, she backtracked a bit saying she had a distant childhood memory of being in a similar photograph, dressed in turn of the century period clothes..
Digging in I found this book was in publication as a reprint and ordered it at Amazon. It arrived recently and as I and others have suspected it’s three girls drawing circles. Just as in the online image scan.
The images are rough. The press plates are long gone and the book had to be scanned. Scanning printed halftones are hard, hence the graininess and washed out highlights and contrast. However, enough detail remains to show there are no pentagrams in the image.
Jessie has said she ordered copies of the pages involving the image from the Library of Congress. But she has never shown scans of the pages, suggesting that others can do this as well and compare them to what she has. Only she has never released her copies. As can be seen in the image above, my reissue has the LOC stamp and 1901 printed on the copyright page. Jessie would have to know this as well, hence her never showing her copies since she knows the pictures she has do not show pentagrams.
So there you have it. It turns out to be a dumb stunt. As if nobody was ever going to find the original source picture? Jessie Czebotar’s claim of being in this picture is obviously false. It’s too old, the castle she mentions does not exist and the alleged photographer Cisco Wheeler was yet to be born when the photo was taken. If you don’t believe it just order a copy from Amazon.
Of course this will not settle it for Jessie’s growing band of followers who have gotten increasingly agitated with my blog posts and other researchers who are calling her out on Twitter. They believe no criticism of Jessie is valid and attack critics as haters, liars, mockers, etc. Their behavior is cultish and they are getting more aggressive and making hints of violence and spiritual annihilation as this tweet shows:
Beware your idols. They ultimately fail.
Notes
It should be noted that the reprinted version published in 2015 had some layout changes. For example the image of the girls is on the left hand page; in the original from 1901 the images are on the right hand page. Nevertheless, the page number, illustration number and image are the same. As already stated, if you believe this is in error, buy your own copy from the link below. You are always going to get a picture of three girls drawing circles from the turn of the last century.
5.24.21
There is a notion that this was intentionally done. Luciferians and for that matter, intel operators are masters at spy craft, diversion, miss direction and adding in a dose of lying, mocking, and side talk into absurd accusations. Just read the Twitter thread with Barbara Roberts debating these people. One of Jessie’s flunkies used a picture that clearly wasn’t the one with the three girls in it. They want to you to respond to a preposterous claim, a method of wearing down the debater in rubbish. Which Barbara responded to, which is what they want.
6.21.12
For over a year now Jessie has been saying she was in the 1901 photo drawing a pentagram with two other girls. Now in a surprising turn around, she is claiming her critics are “falsely claiming” she drew the images. Amazing! It's another lie. Just see the picture above where she claims to be the middle girl in the picture. And more than once, as she has been leaving a digital Twitter trail saying she was drawing them! She uses the picture in all of her media. Notice the misuse of pentagram as “pentacales,” which is misspelled but means pentagram.
7.31.21
One of my more nastier critics is Veronica Swift. She is a diehard Jessie supporter. I have proven many times what a relentless liar Jessie is and apparently, she attracts sycophants such as Veronica to wage propaganda attacks against myself and other critics. No, I don't engage in opinion only, as she once opined about me. It's not an opinion to state the fact that Somerset Belenoff is an internet hoax and Jessie says she met this woman. Nor is it an opinion to point out that Jessie's decoding of Satanic symbols is a cheeky con job using graphics from the Ghostbusters video game.
It's interesting how often you can point out contractions, lack of evidence to support claims, outright falsehoods, and the Jessie cult engages in false personal attacks (hater, paid troll, working for the cabal, etc.) ignoring presented facts. Veronica even went so far in her Twitter feed to suggest ways of influencing Blogspot to suspend my blog for alleged slander. Typically, these cultists have no understanding of the definition of slander and I have done no such thing. Free speech for me, but not for thee...
Obviously troubled, Veronica conducted a deep dive on her blog Lifting the Wool in a piece entitled, Do Pictures Lie?, into the 1901 picture and the surrounding and never ending controversy, i.e., that Jessie was in the picture when it is provable that she is not. In a very long piece it was fascinating to see the depths she went, and everywhere she traveled she ran into the same wall--the wall that she had been duped with and her inability to resolve it. It was as if she was digging to find one piece of evidence that would correct and overturn the whole thing--but to no avail. She failed. While it is a very well written exploration of this issue, it bears no resolution because the picture is a Jessie fiction.
Veronica Swift's of the world just cannot handle the truth.
https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2021/05/13/do-photographs-lie/
9.13.21
Addendum 7.30.21
Keep in mind there is more than one falsehood going on with the picture. In her lengthy article Veronica Swift ignores numerous falsehoods attributed by Jessie. One, the Laurie Cabot Kent castle does not exist. Two, Cisco Wheeler did not take the picture. And three, the pentagrams were added by some unknown graphic artist. All three issues totally ignored. And to think she calls Jessie critics bad researchers.
Sources
New Methods in Education; Art, Real Manual Training, Nature Study, 1901, reprint 2015, p 73, ill 46.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1340042061
Link of online scan
https://archive.org/details/newmethodsineduc02tadd/page/72/mode/2up
My previous posts on the topic of Jessie Czebotar
