OUTWARD TRENDS: Review: An Illuminati Primer by Veronica Swift

Image use allowed under CCL.

Combating propaganda on all fronts…

Blogger Veronica Swift has self published an e-book on the Illuminati. Her main source is Jessie Czebotar and alleged high member of the Illuminati who claims to have been in training to be a Mother of Darkness in the organization. This is largely based on Jessie’s various accounts posted on online video channels. There is little confirmation of her stories from other people that have either been Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) survivors or other former Illuminati members. She claims to be a chaplain but there is little evidence of that either other than her own stories.

As detailed here in this blog, with evidence presented of her own tweets and statements on video, a careful examination of her claims bears little resemblance to the truth. Jessie Czebotar is known to make false statements and tell tall tales. There are some truths buried in her narratives but little substantiation of her personal experiences, if any.

This ebook is a compilation of articles from Veronica Swift’s pro Jessie Czebotar blog Lifting The Wool. Most of which are now under a paywall. It is meant to be an examination of the Illuminati with mentions of 8 former members who are now whistleblowers. However, her main source is Jessie. Which is a shame due to Jessie’s record of uttering many falsehoods on a variety of issues and Swift’s inability or refusal to sort out the truth, if any, from Jessie’s statements.

Likewise, my posts are linked to screen captures, images and video links. Veronica on the other hand, has shown herself to be greatly partisan for Jessie which in turn affects her objectivity and judgement. Her blog’s greatest flaw is that she basically repeats Jessie's thoughts by rote with no analysis—even when Jessie says things that are clearly false. She paints Jessie as a near-god and her critics as people with bad motives. Jessie in her eyes cannot bear a false witness and has no other discernible flaws. Also, Swift ignores many of the controversies that have surrounded Jessie Czebotar since the beginning which I have documented here. Her ebook is filled with this same approach.

Basically, Her blog is more or less the opposite of mine where she repeats Jessie’s words as the ultimate truth while I feature a much deeper and more skeptical examination of Jessie’s actions, claims and controversies. Jessie created a myth for herself and Veronica promotes it without inquiry.

Our Whistleblower

One point that Swift states at the beginning of her book is that she started her blog in order to understand Jessie better. One thing Swift has always believed is that Jessie is a whistleblower or a Federal whistleblower. She is very confident in this belief. Swift coined the phrase, Our Whistleblower or OW in the blog posts as she does in her book. There is no factual basis that Jessie was ever a whistleblower of any kind. Or for that matter, a high level person in a leadership training role in a major Satanic cult such as the Illuminati. But to Veronica Swift, none of that matters.

But notice how people like this gain notoriety by claiming to be a big wheel in something—they never come from lower end occupations; never the janitor or a chauffeur or secretary. They are always special and in a leadership role. This is the basis for Jessie’s legend that has been carefully crafted. Which is easy to do when you can trick (or pick) a group of people with video channels that don’t ask hard questions and let Jessie ramble on, no matter how weird it gets. (Such as a recent Carmen Studer video where Jessie claimed satanists burned people alive using flame breathing dragons.)

Herein lies the biggest issue I have with Veronica Swift’s ebook—she questions nothing about these claims, some outlandish, other’s clearly false if one takes the time to investigate. She will repeat a Jessie statement even if after a deeper look displays a glaring error. Such as Somerset Belenoff, the alleged Queen of the Illuminati who Jessie claims to have met in person along with Belenoff’s husband Vlad who are in reality fictional creations of a hoax launched in January of 2020. Yet Swift will go along with Jessie’s fake story and not look any deeper. All of her blog articles are like this and her ebook as well. I fail to understand why a seemingly intelligent and thoughtful writer as Swift would do this.

(The only deep investigation Swift did on her blog was regarding the 3 girls photo of which Jessie claims to have been drawing pentagrams. It’s been concluded here and in other sources, that she made the whole thing up; the picture in question was shot in 1899. Swift wrote a long piece to conclude falsely that it was inconclusive. She places herself as another true believer that can’t handle the facts and refuses to believe she was lied to. Or else she has some deeper connection that allows her to arrive at these false conclusions.)

Finally, true whistleblowers are brave people that forfeit a normal life when they come forward. To come forward is to be forever hunted down like a rabid dog. Some have shorter lives or if lucky, disappear into obscurity. I have personally known one and her life is one of constantly looking over her shoulder.

Jessie Czebotar does not live a life like this. She freely travels to pre-announced seminars with seemingly no security detail, does several videos a week and has a large and growing social media presence. Her closest family members are also living normal lives and have their social media presences as well. If she lives under constant death threats, why be this open? Why would her family live so openly?

Jessie Facts That Are Not Facts

While Veronica Swift will cite other experts in the study of the Illuminati, her need to have Jessie Czebotar as the main witness to the unlawful and immoral deeds of the satanic group is a major failing. Too bad she could not post a disclaimer that Jessie’s stories are personal in nature and much is unproven and unknown. The myth of Jessie being a whistleblower, a Mother of Darkness in training, a Federal witness, etc., are devoid of actual evidence. And Swift refers to me as a poor researcher? Good research is questioning what one has been told, and not repeating statements with no citation or actual proof. Swift will repeat Jessie stories even when Jessie is in error. If Jessie leaves something blank, Veronica does too.

Points to be taken note of.

This eBook should have a disclaimer: "No information in this book has been properly vetted."
Jessie claims to have met Somerset Belenoff and her husband in person. Belenoff, the so-called queen of the Illuminati, who is in charge of the upper chamber of the World Governing Council, is a proven fictional character in a hoax that launched in January of 2020. But Veronica posts this as a fact. Read more about this at on article, Somerset Belenoff Update. LINK
Jessie Czebotar a whistleblower? There is no evidence she is one. Real whistleblowers are hunted down like rabid dogs, are in hiding or are on the run. They don't make a show of themselves on social media and other venues such as Jessie does. Her “insider” info is either public domain, false narratives she invented or stories lifted from real SRA and general abuse survivors.
Jessie’s purported handler is her “proctor,” also her grandmother. She never lists the name so Veronica apparently can’t either. It’s Clara Church. And she calls people bad researchers?
Jessie is quoted many times saying her proctor/grandmother ritualistically killed 1,000 children a month. Swift ignores this outrageous claim which obviously, is absurd.
Jessie defines Neuschwanstein Castle in Germany as the Mother of Darkness castle. An online search lists the Château des Amerois in Belgium as the MOD castle. Here is an instance of Jessie posting an error and Veronica blindly reposting it without further.
Veronica lists Jessie as a chaplain but only in her notes. So far no evidence that she ever was a chaplain. She has listed numerous health care institutions but never an exact name, city or state and rarely a date of employment. Her Linkedin page lists “Chaplain” and nothing else.
“She’s a federal whistleblower…” Veronica states on page 32 and several other pages, but there is no evidence that Jessie ever was. And which federal agency did she report to? What did she give them? What time and location? It’s another Jessie story that the author fails to document.
Uses Cisco Wheeler a former MOD, as a source although her information on the illuminati contradicts Jessie's narrative. Swift is silent on this issue.

The ISSTD Slander

“International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation has been infiltrated by Luciferians who are trained therapists.”

So writes Veronica on page 117, another example of Jessie’s thoughts and the worst example of it. The notion that a therapeutic profession that treats victims of satanic abuse have been infiltrated by satanists to lend additional harm or get them to rejoin the cult is simply not provable. Jessie once said in a video that ISSTD are the gatekeepers of the Satanic Brotherhood. Again, no proof. However, she has a different take on when chatting online with her special satanist friend Lucien Greaves.

Veronica Swift’s point of view on this is totally false as I show in the next paragraph. This is what happens when one believes someone without fact checking to verify.

So what is Jessie’s real influence regarding this idea? Most likely her Twitter conversations with satanist Lucien Greaves the co-founder of the Satanic Temple. In a series of controversial tweets, she acts like a lovesick school girl having a crush on Lucien.

The issue of the ISSTD is brought up by Greaves. Only his take is completely different; he accuses them of being a group of malpracticing professionals because in his opinion satanic ritual abuse (SRA) does not occur and is a myth used to defame his cult. ISSTD research leads back to his cult and their deeds. So Lucien slanders them as conspiracy mongers and has gone so far as to file a malpractice suit against them. Jessie in conversations with him agrees and offers to help in his work combating them, based on those grounds. Ironic since she bills herself as an SRA victim. Her tweets regarding this have since been removed; however, myself and other researchers have saved dozens of screen shots to prove it. You can see some of them here, LINK. See even more at the The MrDior7 Video List.

I have uncovered no evidence either for, or against ISSTD being a legitimate therapeutic organization. Since both Jessie and Lucien have made conflicting statements regarding this organization and since both are liars, I will side with ISSTD.

Jessie is best described as being two-faced. In her many tweets to Lucien she is generally on his side in any topic he brings up, even things that would be in opposition to her public stance as a Christian chaplain. She says one thing to her Christian followers (ISSTD, infiltrated) and something totally different around her satanist friends (ISSTD, false therapists). Her devoted followers never dig this deep and many do not want to be made aware of these facts. This is cult behavior.

It also demonstrates that Veronica Swift is so totally devoted to Jessie that it blinds her judgement to the facts and controversies. By doing so she takes on the role of a propagandist and not an honest researcher into the subjects presented in her ebook.

The Latest Update, Version 6

Other than cleaning up the grammatical and spelling errors Swift has deleted SRA and MK-ULTRA survivor Cheryl Beck as a source claiming she has lied to her. For transparency, I am in touch with Cheryl almost daily. I have found her to be truthful, open and a great source for inside information. (Meaning more proof that Jessie is not who she claims to be.) I did a deep search on X (Twitter) since this is the only social media I know Cheryl to be on and never saw anything she said of Swift that was a lie. What she did was call out Veronica on her blog piece, "20 Questions for Cheryl Beck," in which Cheryl said she was never contacted about these questions and never knew at the time this article was posted about her. Cheryl was moving out of the Jessie orbit so most likely she was getting the "Veronica Treatment." The questions are superficial at any rate. I doubt that Swift was really looking for answers from Cheryl, who Swift has since blocked on X.

In Closing

It's quite clear from VS eBook and her blog writings she does not vet any information coming from Jessie Czebotar. Actually, too bad there is not a disclaimed that the information in her book has not bee throughly vetted. In the research I have done in my blogs and in contact with a host of other researchers, Jessie Czebotar is not who she claims to be. Her eBook is just a rehash of Jessie stories of which some are true, but most are not and controversial statements or developments are ignored. Veronica Swift does not dig any deeper, claiming in a recent interview (ARA, January 9, 2024) that it is not her aim to debunk someone's personal story. But shouldn't those people who are giving Jessie donations have confidence that they are giving to a trustworthy source? Swift claims to be a Christian as should know we have a God-given right test the spirits and research what we are being told from any source. Something Swift fails at.

Notes

It should be noted that I have a brief history with Veronica Swift. She has personally scolded me online as a poor writer, a poor researcher (more on that later) and the bogus assertion that I only write opinions. Swift in 2021 speculated ways on X to get my blog shut down for slander. That went nowhere. As usual with these people, they have no understanding of what slander is. Swift should know and know better. Calling their beloved Jessie a liar with proof is slander to them. It also shows how fanatical they can get, in this case, desiring to shut down the free speech of people they disagree with. She appears thoughtful and personable in her writing but in her defense of Jessie, which she claims she is not defending, she ignores a wealth of evidence that Jessie a liar and a fraud.

5.11.22

An example of Veronica Swift's thoughts regarding Jessie critics.

1.9.24

And never has been a fan of me either as seen in this tweet from 2021. Nothing she said in this tweet is true and was only a failed attempt to discredit me and my work exposing Jessie's fraud. She also has me blocked on X and then takes shots at me behind my back.