Saturday, July 1, 2023

Jessie Speaks With Forked Tongue


Jessie Czebotar’s lies and bizarre stories caught on video!


As I have documented on my blogs in the past two years the numerous lies and undocumented stories of former Chaplain Jessie Czebotar.  The alleged SRA survivor and alleged member of the illuminati in training to be a “mother of darkness” has grown in popularity despite myself and other researchers documenting the apparent fraud.  


Other this time her stories, most of which are undocumented and provided with nearly no evidence have gotten more far-out

with the passage of time.  Never mind her cult though.  They are unfazed by her weird statements.  She and her fans will just scoff and claim they are taken out of context such as they do for her controversial comments in her tweets.  It’s not much of a defense and fails even further with her recorded statements in the video clips below.


Here is Jessie Czebotar in her own words with her even weirder stories.    


Saturday, June 24, 2023

The Takedown of Otto Otepka

Otto Otepka, Deputy Director of the State Department Office of Security.



What can result from an innocent inquiry.  


Otto Otepka was born in Chicago of Czech-born immigrant parents, had spent most of his life working in security.  In 1953 he started working for the State Department and his big break came in 1957, when he was promoted to Deputy Director of the State Department Office of Security.  This made him the chief security evaluator at the Department of State and his main task was to review and issue security clearances to various officials coming into government service.  


The Otto Otepka story is one of those side stories buried in the minutia of JFK assassination research.  But it’s an important one as it shows some of the inner workings of the government—known these days as the Deep State.  It’s the story of an otherwise capable and honest public servant who starts taking note of things he was not supposed to and the attention it garnered in the Deep State.  When it came across the wire that there was a large group of young men defecting to the Soviet Union in 1960, some 18 of them, that is something take notice of.  And one in particular was listed as a tourist—Lee H. Oswald.  He was listed as a tourist. What young man went to the Soviet Union as a tourist during the Cold War?  Also noted was his good fortune in being able to get a visa and a passport rapidly.  


As researcher Joan Mellon said, “CIA was on the distribution list for the file listing the ‘defectors.’ Mr. Otepka’s job was to correlate the existing files of people whose names were on that list of defectors, Lee Oswald, ‘tourist,’ among them.”


Eventually, Otepka learned that Oswald’s file designation was #39-61981.  In this case, “39” being an intelligence file number.  Otepka took note and began assembling a file on Oswald and making inquires up the chain.  


This triggered a series of events that made its way towards two powerful agencies—the DOJ and the CIA.


And that’s when the trouble started.  And it came from Robert Kennedy, the president’s brother, the then Attorney General at the Department of Justice.  Otepka had his only meeting with Robert Kennedy in December of 1960.  Bobby was his usual anal self, not apologizing for showing up late.  They had a row over a Kennedy loyalist, W. W. Rostow, that Otepka had not given a security clearance to. Otepka had never felt right about the man and had been denied an earlier clearance, twice, back in the mid 1950s.  Bobby left in a huff, without ever getting his man a security clearance.  He also knew from this exchange Otepka was a man of principle that was not going to be pushed around.


It’s a long path from being a respected and valued civil servant to being fired and then brought up on charges of espionage.  So the high, and low, events are in the following bullet points.


  • Otepka’s office phone was bugged and his trash was inspected.
  • Otepka was surrounded by Robert’s flacks to watch him.
  • His main source of harassment was Walter Sheridan working under the oversight of AG Robert Kennedy.
  • Relieved of his security duties and given make-work jobs.
  • His office safe was broken into and his file on Lee Oswald stolen.
  • He was offered other positions in the State Department but turned them down.
  • Eventually fired.
  • After being let go, the DOJ toyed with the idea having Otepka indicted on espionage charges, but nothing ever came of it since there was no proof he had done anything wrong.


Apparently, Robert Kennedy had a deep interest in this defector, Lee H. Oswald.  It’s a central mystery of the Otepka case.  We now know the CIA ran a false defector program into the Soviet Union and other countries such as China.  Did Kennedy know this?  Counter Intelligence Chief James Angleton was concerned enough to establish a SIG 201 file on Oswald solely for gathering and controlling information related to him. 


However, knowledge about Oswald, what his mission was if any, was apparently so intense that it drove one government agency (DOJ) to break in a safe and steal documents from another agency (DOS). There is enough evidence now, some circumstantial and some not,  this originated with AG Kennedy.  


Bobby’s funk he experienced at the death of his beloved brother takes on a new meaning since it is most likely he may have known the name of the man named to be his brother’s killer long before events unfolded. 


As Joan Mellen asks:


The Otepka case, not least, keeps alive a question that cries out for further investigation. How was Bobby Kennedy using Oswald? Was he Oswald’s ultimate handler? Was Bobby protecting and utilizing Oswald at the same time as the CIA, unbeknownst to him, was laying the groundwork for framing Oswald for the murder of his brother?


And Mellon finishes with:


Robert F. Kennedy had enlisted Walter Sheridan, and others, to damage his career in his effort to conceal that he was using Oswald in his anti-Castro activities, Otepka concluded. Otepka was a threat because he could expose who Oswald was. It was at least ‘plausible,’ he says, remaining cautious, that Oswald was a false defector in the Soviet Union. Had they allowed him to uncover Oswald, investigate him as he investigated all those whose names were sent to him in his capacity as Deputy Director, and even as Chief of Evaluations, at the State Department Office of Security, history might have been different.


If you think we have a two-tier system of justice.  Think again.  It’s always been this way.  Just out in the open now.


Endnotes


Some researchers concentrate on the CIA side of the Otepka controversy and others delve into the DOJ side of it. I have not ran across anybody that combines the two. Probably because of Robert Kennedy’s skullduggery is more readily accessible as opposed to CIA chief James Angleton’s actions which are shrouded in layers of classified National Security cover.


Former CIA officer Philip Agee said regarding the SIG 201 file that the first part contained “true name” documents.  The second part contained operation information.  Armstrong, p. 307


Walter Sheridan was Robert Kennedy’s fixer.  Think of the character Mike in the TV series, Breaking Bad.  When RFK needed some dirty work done Sheridan was always up to the task to get the deed done. 



Sources


Otto Otepka, Robert F. Kennedy, Walter Sheridan, and Lee Oswald By Joan Mellen.


http://joanmellen.com/wordpress/kennedy-assassination/otto-otepka-robert-kennedy-walter-sheridan-and-lee-oswald/


What Did Otto Otepka Know About Oswald and the CIA? by Lisa Pease, 1997.


https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/what-did-otto-otepka-know-about-oswald-and-the-cia


Books

Harvey and Lee, John Armstrong, p. 306-308, 390 



Wednesday, June 21, 2023

JFK Assassination Records - 2023 Additional Documents Release



From The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

NARA

“The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is processing previously withheld John F. Kennedy assassination-related records to comply with President Biden’s Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on the Temporary Certification Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, requiring disclosure of releasable records by June 30, 2023. The National Archives has posted records online to comply with these requirements.”

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023

Thursday, June 8, 2023

The Jessie Cult

 

For the last 2 years I have been covering Jessie Czebotar and her rise from obscurity to being an internet influencer.  The chaplain has developed into SRA victim/whistleblower/Federal whistleblower/Federal witness/author/illuminati MOD/survivor and so on.  From research, most of these titles are false and much of her enterprises she operates under the guise of ministry, offer no public accounting since her Ministry, Illuminate the Darkness LLC, is a for profit corporation.   

So far I have not dug too deeply into her followers.  They are immensely important and she would remain the obscure chaplain if not for them.  They are on Twitter and other social media platforms playing a combination of defense and offense for her.  Some are radicalized and rabid in their defense, seeming to lack any empathy for any hurt they project.  Others are probably well meaning believers, but as stated above these devoted folks don’t think critically and their needs for a hero to lead them through the morass of troubled days are satisfied.  By and large, they are her support group and keep her operation financed with donations, book and merchandise purchasing and workshop events.


For the rest of the story, please go to my SubStack page.


https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/the-jessie-cult?sd=pf



Thursday, May 18, 2023

What Is Going On Here?


Apollo 17 in space with two different images and two different looks.

One of the Apollo photographic anomalies from the NASA Flickr archive.

Full article at Substack:  https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/what-is-going-on-here?sd=pf



Thursday, May 11, 2023

What Is Wrong With This Picture?


Apollo photo irregularities remain.


Quite a bit of debate has surrounded the numerous photo collections of the Apollo moon missions.  From the parallel shadow angles to John Young’s jump salute showing dust from the rear video angle but no dust in front still photo angle.  Much has been revealed in professional photographer Jack White’s Apollo photo study (link below) and it is highly recommended to check out his work. 


One thing that has caught my attention outside of Jack’s comprehensive examination, was the images shot of the earth from the moon’s surface.  If there is any fakery being done, it is quite evident in the earth photos since they are in the wrong position from the moon’s angle of view.   


What is wrong with the picture above? This earth shot was from the Apollo 17 mission.  They landed 20 degrees from the moon’s equator.  The earth’s angle is about 45 degrees from the horizon.  However, that is the wrong location.  Since there is no earth rise or earth set, as it lies in a fixed position.  It should have been directly overhead.  A difficult shot to make with a chest mounted camera with no viewfinder.  The Hasselblad camera would have to be removed from its chest mount and pointed vertically with the hope it appeared in-frame for the shot.

 

But there are other problems too.  Such as the size of the earth.  It appears smaller in size than when looking at the moon from earth.  The earth is 3.7 times larger and the distance is the same.  It should be much larger.  In fact, it’s actually smaller in size than what one would observe of the moon from earth!    


In the other picture shot during the Apollo 17 mission which features the flag, the earth is at an even higher angle and even smaller than the other image.  But as stated above, the earth is stationary in the moon's sky.





So the earth is in the wrong position in both images and too small in size as seen from the moon’s surface.  Astronomers have to know this is incorrect.  Have any of them come forward?  No.  They know what abuse will be heaped on them if they point this out.  Nobody wants to go through their professional life as a “toil foil hat” wearer.  





And besides that, how come the Apollo era earth photos never show the aurora borealis?  It’s been active every day since the earth began.  But we never see any images of it from space till the Space Shuttle program and the International Space Station (ISS) commenced.  Why?  What were they really doing up there?





Even this picture of the crescent earth has issues. Where are the city lights? Once again, no northern lights either.


As astronaut Dr. Brian O’Leary said at a UFO conference in 1999, “If some of the film was spoiled, it’s remotely possible they [NASA] may have shot some scenes in a studio environment to avoid embarrassment.”


An amazing admission!  According to Dr. O’Leary, the possibility exists that NASA would fake images if the film were ruined.  And they may have done just that in the Apollo 17 example provided here.  That was always a clear risk of film damage since there was no radiation shielding on the camera body and besides radiation issues, the effects of being in a vacuum can damage film as well.  In fact, if they really were on the moon, I fail to see how they did not damage all the film reels shot in such a toxic environment. 


In conclusion, they either made it to the moon and the film was damaged and to be reproduced in a studio or else it was all a cold war propaganda stunt.



Also published at my Substack: https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/what-is-wrong-with-this-picture?sd=pf


Sources


Jack White's Apollo Studies

https://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_0.htm


Dr Brian O’Leary 

https://www.aulis.com/nasa2.htm


Project Apollo Archive

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums