Tuesday, September 4, 2018

NASA Document Implies No Go To Moon

The curious chart found on the NASA Technical Report Server.

(Updated at:  https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/nasa-document-implies-no-go-to-moon)



A curious chart found on the NASA Technical Report Server.


NASA’s server for technical reports sounds intimidating for us non astrophysics types but it really is not.  Many documents are plans, projections, histories and so on.  There are of course, the heavy mathematical documents but one can skim thru them to understand the overall concepts being presented.  Well, what you suss out what the acronyms all mean.  If you are a space flight researcher, it is a site to visit often.  Surprises abound.

Space exploration has always been dogged by one major restraint—radiation.  Radiation makes all of space a giant toxic zone that goes on forever.  Even the crew of the International Space Station (ISS) has to work around the dangers of radiation in low earth orbit (LEO) when they have laptops that need to be rebooted and cameras that fail from radiation damage.

But even the radiation experienced in LEO aboard the ISS is low compared to venturing farther out in space.  The first hurdle for traveling to the moon is the Van Allen radiation belts, discovered by Dr. James Van Allen in 1958, is the earth’s force field from the incoming toxic soup of charged particles and trapped within the donut shape of the field.  The two belts start at about 400 miles from the earth and extend to over 36,000 miles.  Most science sites, such as Popular Science and others, state that to pass through this hazardous zone the Apollo spacecrafts used a trajectory that allowed them to pass thru the thinner parts of the belts.  Sort of an arch instead of a straight line.  That method is not mentioned in any of the astronaut’s books and certainly was not a viable action for Apollo 13 in its crisis situation with its limited fuel.   

The trajectories from the earth and to the moon are called “free return trajectories” and also known as a “slingshot.”   They use the gravitational field and a burn to slingshot to the target, in this case the moon and vise-versa. The limited fuel capacity is not there for any fancy maneuvering.  

Mission Dose Chart
While researching radiation exposure in space and the lunar voyages I came across the, “Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties – 2010,” found on the NASA Technical Report Server.  It features a large amount of data on how radiation effects internal organs, cancer risks, male and female dose variations and so on.  Important information to know for future space missions.

On page 28 one can see the chart posted above.  It charts the amount of radiation exposure for all of NASA’s manned missions from  Mercury to the ISS.  Notice where Apollo is placed—right beside the Space Shuttle in the middle of the chart!  It is well known that the highest radiation levels are passing thru the Van Allen radiation belts, solar radiation in cislunar space and lastly, the nuclear hazard zone of the moon.  The Shuttle never left low earth orbit.  If Apollo traveled to and landed on the moon, it should be listed at the top of the chart.  Instead, the International Space Station, the  Russian Mir and Skylab are.  They are equating the sum of Apollo’s moon journeys to only the radiation exposure one would experience in low earth orbit.  How can this be?

Or rather, how could NASA allow these learned authors of this report,  publish something like this?

In Closing
The Apollo moon missions traveled the farthest out.  They went beyond the earth’s protective magnetosphere where the deadliest radiation from cosmic rays, gamma rays, x-rays and so forth exist.  If they completed the moon missions then their radiation protection in the space crafts to the space suits, with this low of an exposure rate, must have been constructed of some classified technology never shared with the public.  Or else, they did not complete the missions as presented to the public.


Once again, NASA is making the impossible, seem possible.  And that is what wizards do.


Addendum, 9-5-18
Actually, the flights of Gemini should have been higher on the chart as well.  According to Micheal Collins in is book, Catching The Fire, page 261, Gemini flight 11 reached a record altitude of 875 miles above earth in 1966.  Collins, along with John Young in their Gemini 10 flight, set the previous record of 475 miles.  Which would place both missions in the lower rung of the Van Allen belts.  There is no report of radiation sickness at these altitudes despite being in the belts.  The highest Space Shuttle flight occurred in 1990, STS-31 at an altitude of 380 nautical miles.  There are stories of the crew getting mild radiation sickness but have not been able to verify this event.

Addendum, 8-15-18
Researcher Randy Walsh in his book The Apollo Moon Missions, on page 144 states that astronaut dosimeter readings are averages, with the specific readings classified. Maybe because they never went into cislunar space?  (Please note the author does not source this allegation.)



Sources

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/

Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties – 2010

Thursday, August 30, 2018

Buzz And His Missing Antenna

Buzz Aldrin on lunar surface but something is different.

Evidence of staging problems.

When researchers go searching for Apollo photography anomalies they always claim that the photos Neal Armstrong took of Buzz Aldrin emerging from the LEM were too well lit in the shadows, implying that additional lighting was used.  The official story is that the lunar surface is reflective and the clear illumination of the Buzz Aldrin in shadow, is basically the same as using a reflector (also known “fill light”).  Having been a professional photographer and having used both flash strobes and reflectors, I see no problem with the theory of a reflective lunar surface.  Bounce lighting occurs in nature.  

One issue that seems to be overlooked is the appearing and disappearing of the VHF antenna on the life support backpack known as the Portable Life Support System (PLSS).  The antenna is located on the top right side (from the front) and allows for communication between astronauts on the lunar surface during EVA, to NASA in Houston and the uploading of telemetry data.  For storage, it is folded down and must be manually raised to an upright position.  It should be in an extended position at all times on the lunar surface.  It is not clear if communications are hampered but having the antenna in a down position.  But this is not a concern here.  Instead, it is the apparent rapid appearance and disappearance of the VHF antenna in the lunar photographic evidence with only seconds or minutes missing in between frames.




Figure 1.  Buzz Aldrin setting up the Solar Wind Composition (SWC) experiment, from his left and front.  These shots were mere moments apart.  Note the sudden missing antenna on the image to the right.



Figure 2.  Buzz Aldrin setting the SWC from his right.  Once again, the antenna is missing even while the photographs are apparently shot only a few seconds or moments apart, and Buzz is in a different position.  



Figure 3.  Buzz Aldrin at attention by the flag on the lunar surface.  



Figure 3.1.  Same image with cropped close-ups of the helmet area. Once again, images are shot only seconds apart and the antenna is missing again on the image to the right.

In this odd sequence taken from Buzz’s left and right the antenna is appearing and disappearing in each pair of photos.  It is almost as if there is another photographer shooting these images besides Neal Armstrong, as he would have had to moved quickly to the other side of Buzz as he was setting up the experiment.  It is unclear why a different angle would be needed here in the first place.  The antenna may have simply fell over, but in this pair of images, Buzz is completing different states of his task and it occurs each time in the photographic record. 

The few, very few images taken of Neal Armstrong show no antenna issues.  So far, no issues of this sort have been found on other Apollo lunar landings.  If so, another posting will appear on that.

In film production there is a job called “continuity supervisor.”  This person’s task is to make sure all objects  are positioned in their original places in case anything is moved or broken during multiple takes during filming.  Sometimes photos are taken to insure proper placement. And sometimes they don’t catch everything and an object will disappear or appear in a different place in a scene.  Seems like something similar happened in these images, if they were faked.


A note on the images.  Links are provided below for all photos here to show that none have had image data manipulated.  No edited out antennas or anything else.  Images have been cropped for clarity with basic cropping and adjustments with auto levels.  Nothing else.


Sources

Flickr NASA Apollo Archive
Top Image

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/22042577106/in/photostrea

Figure 1



Figure 2 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21880567980/in/photostream/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21445908204/in/photostream/


Figure 3 and 3.1

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21445931234/in/photostream/


Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Swart STR-Tweed Amp Review




August 12, 2022 UPDATE

Finally, I did coax some good sounds out of the Swart with a Boss reverb pedal or a MRX delay pedal.  I got the right volume at last, despite how quirky this amp is. After a couple of weeks I went to use the amp again and noticed the volume had dropped off considerably, even when turn up high.  I took off the back panel to see one of the power tubes was barely lit.  So I ordered a replace and once installed, did not fix the volume loss problem.

One day when I can find a reliable amplifier tech I'll have it fixed and then sold.


~0~

Original Review, 2-28-18

Ever notice that it is hard to find reviews of Swart amps online?  Not the corporate ones.  I mean the user reviews. Well, here is one at least.

I recently bought one from a seller on Reverb.com and while Reverb often bugs me to write a review of gear I buy off their site, they have no button available to write a review of my Swart amp purchase.  Nor do they email requesting a review like they do for other purchases.  I see no other reason as to why this option would not be available.  Unless, it is because Swart produces amps of such poor sound quality for such a huge price that negative reviews might affect sales.

This $1,350 amp was almost a return.  First off, besides great build quality, these Swart amps are well known for outstanding, lush spring reverb. I had a hard time getting it to work.  My unit has a quirk where the volume control effects the amount of reverb that is produced.  At first I got reverb that was barely heard.  As an experiment, I cranked the volume knob up to max and then maxed out the reverb and what did I get?  No reverb!   I have owned a lot of amps over the years but never had one where increased volume output deceases the reverb output.  This amp acts like it was wired up by somebody that should be denied access to a soldering gun!

After fiddling with the knobs and Hi/Lo gain switch, I set it to Low and the volume knob set to low.  If I want louder tones I control that from the guitar.  Finally!  Lush tube driven spring reverb from a concert hall to the bottom of a mine shaft.  Too bad this amp, as simple as it is, took so much experimentation just to arrive at its major feature.  Nobody should have to have to go thru this nonsense.  

I am still researching the sound quality, trying different settings, pedals an guitars.  Often it sounds harsh and boxy and is in need of a compressor pedal to balance runaway frequencies.  Overall, it is crude.  Does run quiet enough for recording but hums badly at higher volume levels where tube breakup is supposed to be its other great feature.  In fact, I never got any tube distortion.  The reverb, once you figure out how it works, is the only redeeming value and there is no need to pay over $1,000 for that.

The amp came with no warranty documentation in the box.  Never saw any warranty information on the web site either.  Highly unprofessional to market a product at this price range and not provide the owner with warranty guarantee.  No amp cover either.

I would sell the Swart but I don't want anybody else to be stuck with it.

Ultimately, boutique amps are specialty audio equipment, hand built and wired and priced high to imply something "special" about them since they are built retro.  In this case, superb construction combined with weird features and crude audio hardly ranks as special.  At this price point, there are much better options in the $1,000 or less range.   

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Yes, Barack Obama is a Muslim



Recent polls indicate a large number of Americans, 29% view president Barak Obama as a Muslim and not a Christian.  The mainstream media act appalled at this finding.  Maybe because of their constant support of Obama, the alleged Christian man.  Even callers to conservative talk shows, the very shows that feature Obama's biggest critics, don't last very long if the dare call Obama a Muslim.  They are instantly cut off.  In the end, all factions of the media in the United States treat Barak Obama's religious affiliations as unworthy of discussing.  It's about as toxic as the birth certificate issue and they seem to go to great lengths to dismiss any notion of Obama being a Muslim.

This was evidenced on CNN on the morning of September 18, as the host was discussing presidential candidate Donald Trump not correcting a man at a town hall meeting for (having the audacity) to call Obama a Muslim and a foreigner.  The host made sure Obama was referred to as, "our Christian president..."  CNN then featured a young female Islamic expert who wrote it all off as "Islamophobia."  That of course is the catchword of the day...Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia.  It's a word used to end a debate.  You disagree with me so you must be a hater.  Never mind that Europe has fought 10 major wars with Muslim armies from 711 AD till 1699, with the spectacular defeat of Islamic hordes at Vienna in 1683.  Russia has fought at least nine wars on their own.  Dozens of other wars were fought by other countries in the region, all started by Islamic belligerence. 

But is Barak Obama a Muslim?  Under Islamic law he is.  All one needs is to have one parent that is a Muslim and a child burn into such a family is considered a Muslim for life.  He is granted this thru his father, a Kenyan born Muslim.  The CNN Muslim expert should have known this but never mentioned a word regarding it. The whole thing is becoming  something that is not allowed to be uttered in public.  The mainstream press will have a hissy fit over this issue if anybody raises this issue.

The US media loves Obama.  They have a lot invested in his image which he has carefully crafted thru them.  The idea that he is a total fraud is abhorrent to them.  Hence, their fanaticism about squashing anyone who thinks he is.  

For a man that claims to be a "devout Christian" he doesn't act like one.  But as stated in Matthew, "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them..."  Barak Obama is habitual liar and is consistently duplicitous in his actions.  He has little or nothing to do with the Christian faith.  Never attends church except for a media showing at Easter; criticizes Christianity at a prayer breakfast for the Crusades never mentioning the conflict was started by the Muslims; skips the National Prayer Breakfast one year so he could host an Islamic prayer breakfast instead and spends most of December on vacation during the Christmas holidays so as not to participate in them.

Obama is so comfortable with deception he employs almost every time he opens his mouth.  Regardless of what one believes, lying is unethical.  But Islam teaches Muslims that it's not a sin to lie to an "unbeliever" (i.e., non-Muslim). What true follower of Christ's teachings would behave like this?  A Muslim would.  When Christians are being ruthlessly persecuted around the world it's painfully apparent that Obama has little to say or do about it.  

If not a Muslim he certainly has an affinity for their faith and customs.  In speeches he is constantly patronizing this religion, making up nonsense about how tolerant they are of other faiths.  What Christian man when swore in as president has to have not only a Bible to place his hand on, but a Koran as well?   He's upped the amount of Muslim refugees and immigrants entering the United States to around 200,000 a year.  How many Muslim immigrants is enough?  And he makes sure they are settled in heavily Christian and conservative politically areas of the country, i.e., the Red States. 

On September 25, 2012 Obama gave a speech at the United Nations.  Regarding religious issues he said, "The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."  He then followed up similar words about Jesus but Christ (oddly, not the mentioning the faith in, but the images of Jesus instead) comes last.  Again, what Christian man does that?  As I was once told by a Muslim friend, in Islam, Jesus is regarded as the second highest prophet under Mohammed.  One can see Obama's order of placement of these two great religious figures.  He is telling us where his heart lies.

Here are more examples of Barak Obama being Muslim friendly:

  • Reportedly had told an Egyptian Foreign Minister that, “I am a Muslim.” (Nile TV)
  • Wears a Muslim ring that denies Christ.  Also, does not wear it during the month of Ramadan, per Muslim custom not to wear jewelry during this Muslim time of fasting.
  • Surrounds himself with Muslim advisors and appoints Muslims to top positions in the Federal government bureaucracy. 
  • Consistently refers to the Koran as the "Holy Koran."  He rarely refers to the Bible as holy.
  • Openly mocks Bible passages.  Never mocks any passage from Islamic scripture.
  • Refuses to admit that most international terrorism is spawned from the teachings of Islam.
  • Obama ordered the United States Postal Service to honor a Muslim holiday with a commemorative stamp.
  • Orders NASA to start a Muslim outreach, stating that it should be their "foremost mission."  Shouldn't space exploration be the Foremost Mission?
  • Obama gives speeches as Christian Universities and demands Christian symbols to be covered up.  He does not make the same demands at Islamic events.
  • Obama always hosts the Eid al-Fitr dinner to signal the end of the Muslim month of fasting called Ramadan.
  • Obama issues Asylum Decree rules that favors Muslims over Christians and makes it more difficult for persecuted Christians to enter the USA.
  • “I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.”  Muslims refer to Islam as “revealed."
  • In front of a grouping of African leaders Obama used the Muslim "Shadada" hand sign, the upraised index finger with thumb resting on the middle finger.


Much more could be written here regarding Barack Obama and his Islamic sympathies and support.  All examples here show a man with a great connection to the Muslim faith.  He was certainly listed as one as a child when he lived in Indonesia under the name of Barry Soetoro.  It is unknown if he is a practicing Muslim, praying in the direction of  Mecca five times a day.  He may one day reveal his real faith at some later date.  The reader should get a closer understanding of Obama's affinity for Islam and how he helps them at every chance he gets.  To think of Obama as a Muslim is not a far-fetched idea.  In fact, Christianity gets no similar attention or support from him.


"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them..." 


Sources
Gates of Vienna  (Excellent!)
http://gatesofvienna.net/

Reasons why Obama is a Muslim
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/09/21/37-reasons-why-obama-is-a-muslim/

Obama, 2012 UN speech
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly

Obama, 2014 UN speech
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/24/remarks-president-obama-address-united-nations-general-assembly

Muslim evidence in United Nation Speech
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/what-you-missed-in-obamas-united-nations-speech.html

Obama Muslim ring...'THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH'
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/

Obama's New Asylum Decree Favors Muslims Over Christians
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/022114-690860-obama-immigration-reforms-seem-to-come-with-religious-test.htm

Islam revealed...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/11/obama-my-muslim-faith/?page=all

Shadada hand sign...
http://itsallaboutmuhammad.com/2015/02/is-president-obama-a-muslim/

Obama has a 72% approval rating amongst Muslims.
http://clashdaily.com/2014/07/islams-love-obama-72-approval-among-muslims/

Friday, July 24, 2015

The State of Apocalyptic Fiction


Nothing like impending doom and the destruction of civilization to make for entertaining reading, movies, video games and TV shows.  It's a popular brand of fiction that has been around a long time.  Probably the earliest example is Mary Shelley's The Last Man, published in 1824.  Since then there has been a steady stream of apocalyptic literature:  The Stand, Lucifer’s Hammer, A Canticle For Leibowitz, I Am Legend, On The Beach, One Year After, The Drowned World, Alas Babylon, The Postman, The Hunger Games, Divergent–the list is endless.

And why this fascination?  It's apparently a popular form of fiction as new novels on this subject are cranked out just about every year.  Rather than speculate about other readers I'll talk about my interest.  For me, it's interesting to see a different way of living.  Sort of a return to the old ways of life without indoor plumbing, electricity, speedy travel and communication, refrigeration, internet...all the things that enhance and add comfort to our lives.  It's observing how the good people maintain order without creating a police state.  It's also about scrutinizing human nature and seeing how quickly normal, law abiding people quickly turn to their baser instincts.  And it's not a myth–one can see the breakdown occurring at most natural disasters or the aftermath of war.  Most authors of the apocalypse generally get this right.  

Of course it's a world none of us would want to live in.  Unless you are a survivalist loner.  Constantly searching for food, or trying to harvest it from a poisoned landscape would indeed be a hardscrabble life and one not long lived.  Constantly looking over your shoulder for possible attacks or robberies; continually having to defend what you possess; dealing with health emergencies with little or no medical treatment available; burying family and friends as they die in the aftermath of total ruination.  My main interest is seeing how people cope with all of this hardship and get through it.  I suspect that is the main interest of the authors writing such stories.  Let us all hope and pray it never happens. 

What follows is a run down of some of the apocalyptic novels I read and my comments on them.  It's not meant to be the best of, and it is by no means final; I'll add more books to the collection in time.  So stop back in the future for updates.

The Stand by Stephen King
One Apocalyptic Novel to Rule Them All

Stephen King once remarked how dismayed he was that so many people told him how The Stand was their favorite novel, despite all of the best sellers he's churned out over the past 30 years.  Nevertheless, The Stand is epic storytelling featuring the age-old conflict between the forces of good and the forces of evil in the aftermath of a weaponized flu outbreak and it never gets any better than this.  Featuring great characters such as the Godly Mother Abigail to the creepy demonic Randall Flagg, the narrative is as big as the landscape stretching from the northeastern area of the USA, across the rocky mountains, to the desert sands of Nevada.  It is to King's talent as a fiction author that he breathes so much life into his characters and the story itself.  He can make the supernatural seem natural. 

It's King's biggest novel, at ​over ​1,200 pages and is good to the last drop. Published in 1978 it was updated with additional narrative in 1990.  If you have not read it I recommend the later version.  King has been criticized for unsatisfying endings.  He almost did it in The Stand but managed to pull it off at the end.  One thing that always interested me about the story is how the evil and seemingly undefeatable Randall Flagg gathers an army of misfits, losers, and social outcasts to his side but in the end, they are ultimately his undoing.  And how fitting is that? 

Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel
The Woke Version of Apocalypse

This novel could also be dubbed the "chick-lit" version of the apocalypse as well. The story starts out promising enough about a troupe of post-apocalypse Shakespearean actors traveling to and fro among isolated communities presenting the plays of the great Bard.  It's a cool idea really, and an interesting take on this genre of fiction.  But ultimately, it bogs down on the weight of the author's own pretentious and misdirected thematic direction.

One of the characters, a famous actor, dies early on before the killer flu breaks out and his life is revisited in flashbacks throughout the story.  Why, I have no idea since he must be one of the most boring literary figures to ever appear in print.  What a waste of paper! One of the characters keeps a scrapbook of clippings on this man.  What on earth is it?  Is the post-apocalyptic world this dull?  It is in this version of the world's end.

The second issue is the title of the book, drawn from a graphic novel of the same name.  Oh how cool!  I kid.  Some of the characters obsess over it.  I never understood what was so special about this comic book or why any of the characters cared about it.  It seems to have no relevance to the plot and it's not a guide to where anybody needs to go.  When a central object is a ring, a sword, or whatever, it forms in the mind's eye more clearly and carries the weight and purpose of the narrative.  Describing printed graphics is off-putting and it's hard to visualize what the art really looks like and what impact it is supposed to have.

And finally all the agendas.  The females are strong, decisive, intelligent and virtuous.  The men are a bunch of spineless sissies who blunder about like a bunch of dullards being outwitted and led by the highly intelligent and resourceful women.  What a poor specimen of manliness they all are.  They resemble a bunch of trendy metrosexuals.  The only remotely strong male figures are the bad guys but like the other men in the story the females outwit them.  Anyway, this is all part of the modernist writers and their rearranging of gender roles in making women appear almost superhuman or god-like.  Strong female characters are great!  But come on, we need a reasonable balance here.  

Overall...promising but not enough post-apocalypse story telling that quickly fades into a bore of things better left alone.

One Second After by William R. Forstchen
EMP Apocalypse

One lady in this t​ome​ remarks, "Sometimes I feel like a character in a bad novel."  Sorry to inform you dear Character, but this is your eternal home!  Let that line be a good example of what you aspiring writers out there should never use in a story.  It might blow back on you!  While the highly educated William R. Forstchen may be well versed in the technology involving an EMP attack, which fries all electronics and sends the modern world back to the dark ages, fiction writing is apparently not his forte.  It's an example of how career flipping sometimes fails and one should stick to their chosen field of endeavor.  The story reads like a first novel (which it is not), the one you write to get some experience but have enough good sense to never publish.  His characters are bland–they don't live and breathe. Their dialogue comes off stilted and lacking in natural flow.  And speaking of that, in the tablet version, two characters have a conversation that lasts for around nineteen pages.  Oh my!  I skipped most of that blather and don't feel bad because of it.  

A good book to read about how an EMP works but the rest is typical post apocalyptic battle lore where the barbarians show up for your stuff and your women and you have to kill them all.

One side note...I was really annoyed how he treated my home state of Florida.  It got worse in the disaster with some sort of poisoning of the ocean.  Oh come on!  There are thousands of lakes, ponds, creeks and so on to fish out of, not to mention a steady supply of wild game.  Really, we would survive far better than his characters located in the NC mountains.  Can you farm up there in the winter? ​ ​No, and in fact, it’s hard to farm at all in the mountains.  Here, we can grow vegetables and fruit all year long.  Abundant game, livestock, fish in the waterways...it’s the author’s biggest goof.

World War Z by Max Brooks
Zombie Apocalypse!

Haven't we had our fill of zombies?  Not by a long shot!  Zombies have come to possess our fears of future ruination with a touch of horrible bizarreness.  They pop up all over the place in popular culture from movies, TV shows, comic books, video games, to an unending publication of novels.  Like a wave of shuffling zombies it just keeps on coming.

Max Brooks's account of a zombie apocalypse is quite original with a novel that reads basically as a series of after action reports.  No set of characters reappear throughout the story so each report is different.  Brooks documents the ebb and flow of a world wide bizarro zombie conflict in such a realistic manner you have to remind yourself this is fiction, not a history of a real event.  The zombie war features patient zero outbreak, techniques and survival of individuals, military tactics to stave off the undead hordes, the psychological effects on the survivors, and all manner of interesting lore. 

Ultimately, a great entry in the apocalypse genre.

And the movie.  It's just okay.  Stick to the book.

The Dog Stars by Peter Heller
Shooting, Flying and Fornicating in the Post-Apocalypse!

This version of the post-apocalypse comes down to a bunch of gunning, flying and sexing.  The lead character survives the end of the world to fly around in a single engine plane in Colorado with his dog.  How cute!  Dog characters rarely survive in stories like this so shed your tears now.  The lone survivor sets up sniper nests to shoot the bad people when they come up to his house with the porch light on.  Bang!  How is that for the cowardly dispatching of the bad guys?  His ex-army buddy on the other side aides in shooting them too.  The violence charges on with little sympathy for the victims, or guilty conscience among the shooters.  Eventually the sole survivor meets up with a hottie living on the mountainside with her daddy.  Nothing like love among the ruins though you can hardly call this book a post-apocalypse romance novel.  It all ends rather abruptly with the good people surviving at the end but with nowhere to go.  There is no there, there.  Where is the character development?  Where is the big plot reveal?  Who are these people anyway?  I was left wanting more and not getting it.

One thing I did find disappointing, and a bit annoying, is that in the book's Reading Group Guide is a list for other Apocalypse novels to read.  The Stand is not on the list.  That's an offense.  Oh well, all interested readers in this type of fiction know and have most likely read The Stand by now.  At least somebody can write a classic of the form, something that alludes to Mr. Heller.

The Road by Cormac McCarthy
Post Apocalypse Doom and Gloom

Probably the most depressing of apocalypse novels listed here.  The end of the world as we know it doesn't get any darker and grittier than this.  The story involves the travels of a father and his son.  Together, they travel through a ruined landscape of gloomy skies, distant rumblings, bad people, cannibals, and a constant scavenging for food.  McCarthy never tells the reader what the names of the two characters are what caused the end to come.  Despite being the darling of the lit critics, and a hipster of modern prose, McCarthy forgoes quotation marks for his dialogue. How's that for hip prose writing?  It's up to you to suss out who is talking to who.  I guess the old way of doing it is for the throwbacks that still love pecking away at their manual Underwoods.  I'm suspecting that Cormac McCarthy fancies himself some kind of cool dude.  Only too cool for school since he isn't going by the normal literary rules of serve and volley.  Despite all of that independence, he actually won a literary award for his dark story.  

Having said all of that, this novel is high up in the cannon of apocalyptic fiction.  The movie is a very accurate portrayal of the book.  God help us if any of this ever comes true. 

Swan Song by Robert M. McCammon
The Supernatural Apocalypse Mixed with Mad Max

Often compared to King's The Stand and deservedly so.  Also often said, if you like The Stand you'll like this too.  I sure did.  Robert M. McCammon's version of the apocalypse features interesting characters dealing with episodes of supernatural and magical events, warring armies of survivors, and mixed with great hardship for all.  Yes, Swan is a special little girl with supernatural powers to guide them all through the holocaust. (Mmm...I wonder where McCammon got that character sketch from?)  The main plot revolves around three bands of survivors: A shape shifting Randall Flagg type entity in pursuit of a homeless woman with a magical jewel; a former soldier with a whiz kid; and a giant pro wrestler teamed up with Swan.

Robert M. McCammon demonstrates his skill as a very good fiction writer.  His dialogue and pacing is well focused and his characters are fully realized with noticeable personality types, each with their own speech patterns.  He chronicles concise backgrounds on his characters, but not long, rambling bios.  Because of this, the narrative isn't bogged down and the story takes flight at a good pace.  His handling of a nuked out world with adverse weather, bizarre lighting, endless destruction, and dangerous people and animals is very well rendered.  

Highly recommended.

The End by G. Michael Hoff
EMP Apocalypse...Again!

Now there is an appropriate title for an apocalyptic story.  They could all be named that. What G. Michael Hopf does in The End make​s​ One Second After look good. Which also means it's that bad.  

Authors have learned that when approaching a subject of this scale to concentrate their energies on a handful of survivors.  Robert M. McCammon did in Swan Song and so Hopf does here concentrating on his main character, a former Marine with his family; his brother in the Marines overseas; and lastly, a Speaker of the House drafted to be president since DC has gotten nuked and the real president and vice president have been vaporized.  And off the story goes running, with the usual mayhem of societal breakdown after the EMP occurs and modern life comes to a grinding halt.

Probably the worst part of the novel is the main character, Gordon Van Zandt.  The ex-Marine starts out as a tender family man only to quickly turn into a cold blooded killer, shooting unarmed men and then robbing them.  The hero is a sociopath with no remorse where the ends justify the means.  Van Zandt at one point gets a man to surrender by telling him he won't hurt him.  Then shoots him anyway.  How can the reader root for a monster like this?

All writers have their quirks in their writing.  With Hopf, he has the habit of mentioning a character's height when introducing them and most of them are tall.  The men mainly and the women rarely.  It borders on being obsessive and after a while, hilarious.  Apparently the author considers the short characters somehow disadvantaged as if they lost life's lottery on tallness.  However, the author notes that they make up for it with "colorful" personalities, as if the shorties need some kind of redemption.  With every new person introduced I waited for the height report and Hopf never failed to deliver.  Frankly, this displays a tad of amateurism on the author's part.  Too much repetition.  A no-no for professionals.

G. Michael Hopf could easily be the character in the Beatles's tune, Paperback Writer. He has a pot-boiler writing style and one could almost envision him at his Underwood cranking them out. And in fact, he does, since The End (apparently not really the end...) is the first book in the four-book, New America Series.  These are self-published books and this first volume features poor editing, awkward and redundant sentence construction, amateurish dialogue, and minimal character development.  One can hope he got an editor for the following volumes.  A language arts teacher would do nicely as I discovered for my self-published novel. 

I would avoid this one.

I Am Legend by Richard Matheson
Vampire Apocalypse!

Author Richard Matheson proves himself an able writer of prose.  In this account of civilization’s end, a bacterium causes humanity to convert to the classic vampire meme. Matheson creates a plausible vampirism biology which his lead character investigates for a cure.

The hero of the story Robert Neville, must withstand nightly attacks in his fortified house while resisting the urge to give up. Neville is haunted by the loss of his wife and daughter and often turns to drink. This novel is a classic study in isolation and Matheson accurately relates Neville’s loss, pain, and loneliness as he questions his desire to go on amid the chaos of the bizarre world he is cast in.

Once again, the movie starring Will Smith is nothing like the novel.  Hollywood just uses the title. Too bad as the story presented here is so much better than the one they invented for the movie.  Plus, the novel's ending explains what I Am Legend means.

The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins
Femdom Dystopia!

It seems fiction of late with strong female leads just can't get any balance.  Just like Ocean Eleven's modern feminist agenda, Suzanne Collins's Hunger Games trilogy suffers the same fate.  The strong main character, Katniss, is so dominating she could just be called Super Girl with a bow and be done with it.  As per the script, the females are virtuous and brave and the men are either villainous or spineless wimps and cut outs.  The archetype here is: A strong man is an evil man. 

In this post apocalyptic world where what is left of civilization is divided into districts ruled by a central government.  Since food is in short supply a competition is devised to have children and teens fight each other to the death in a nationally televised event to win food for their district.  It's all heavily hyped to the population at large, like a bizarre dystopian version of a Super Bowl game.  The kids, picked by lottery and treated as pampered stars, are trained in combat and weapons and how to murder one another. 

And this trilogy of books is marked as a children's book series!   A totally creepy idea.

The heroine of the story, Katniss, does what nobody else can do–beat a rigged system and out with its software and special effects.  She not only wins but saves a boy she's partnered with, Peeta, who like other spineless males, needs her help to get through it all.  She then goes on to become the leader of a resistance movement.  More bloodshed follows.  Is Suzanne Collins trying to show kids that violence solves problems?  It does in this dark dystopian tale.

Never the less, this best selling trilogy has won critical acclaim from the usual typists in the mainstream media who typically review fiction like this with little regard to moral considerations or the message being sent to young people–a story of morbidity, of torture, and of killing people, even the most innocent, to feed your family.

Really, it reads like ​e​nd ​t​imes fiction until our own real-life End Times dawns on us.

The Dark Tower Series by Stephen King
King invents new literature genre:  Incomprehensible Fantasy

Sprawling through 7 novels is a hodge-podge of every fiction genre one can imagine.  The reader is dragged through the wild west, science fiction, time travel, multiverse travel, horror, fantasy, romance and last but not least, the apocalypse.  The tale rambles on so, it lacks consistency with the mixing of the genres that do not mesh well together.  There is too much blather, drawn out dialogue exchanges and backstory breaks that disrupts the narrative flow.  It appears as if King took on a project a bit out of his ability to properly narrate.  

Stephen King’s Magnum Opus.  This 7 novel series was written over the course of many years of King’s career as the popular horror fiction writer.  Never has a writer of fiction been so indulgent.  I know of no instance in Western literature where the author of a fiction work features himself as a character in the narrative.  He then resorts to including references to his earlier novels and even brings back a few past characters who he then manages to kill off.  One character finds the novel that King has written (Salem’s Lot) that features himself and all of his events in his story.  How weird is that?  This is an example of a writer taking indulgence to the extreme.

Regarding the apocalypse, we are told, “The world has moved on.”  A good catch phrase that could apply to our world now. Too bad as this novel series it is basically a backdrop for the quest of heroes who are out to save “Beams” which we are told hold the world together in harmony.  A world that doesn’t appear to be worth saving but our band of heroes press on regardless even as the Beams fade from relevance.  

The overall quality is spotty, with some novels in the series being good classic King reads and the others not so much. One novel in the set I refused to read has the main character Roland, the gunslinger, telling a story to his band of heroes and while in the middle of that, he meets up with another character along the way and tells a different story to him.  A story within a story!  Meanwhile, the quest of Roland and his band of heroes is delayed to the next book.  Maybe it is just me, but I want to read the story of the quest, not take indulgent side trips like this.  

Lord of the Rings Magnum Opus, it clearly is not.  Stephen is a very good fiction writer.  He deserves his success.  But here, he fails.  This series shows he is not up for something this big.

It’s all about the journey and not the arriving as King states at the end of the final novel, The Dark Tower.  I guess that is his half-ass excuse for the less than satisfactory ending, which he is famous for, and which he did here.


Sources
All books mentioned in this piece are available at Amazon, Barnes&Noble, iTunes iBooks, and Kindle. 

Thursday, April 30, 2015

DiPinto Guitars And The Fender-Gibson Hegemony

DiPinto Galaxie 2s

When I saw my first DiPinto guitar I thought...this is the guitar the Jetsons would play.  A guitar with a really funky design with graceful curves and rounded horns.  The oversized headstock added to a cartoon look and I don’t mean that in a bad way.  Just cool and different.  I then started searching the Net looking for everything I could find on DiPinto guitars.  The model I first saw and would later buy, was the DiPinto Galaxie 2s in green sparkle finish.

The DiPinto story is an interesting one based on typical American ingenuity and innovation.  A young guitar player, Chris DiPinto, is a lefty and had a hard time getting left handed instruments.  He also had a love of offbeat guitar design. The kind of guitars found pawn shops with obscure names, odd designs, and more knobs and switches than they should have had.  The solution?  Make your own.  Soon others starting seeing his guitars in performance and wanted one too.  As Chris said in an interview, all he wanted to do was make guitars and own a guitar factory.  His dream came true.



Galaxie 2s signature headstock.

Craftsmanship
Overall, quite good for an Asian made guitar.  Really, we need to stop looking down our noses at guitars built over there.  My Squire 50’s Classic Vibe Telecaster is built in Fender’s facility in China and it’s the best Telly I’ve ever owned.  DiPinto guitars are built in South Korea and with Chris and his American luthiers doing the final set-up.  Each guitar is checked out by Chris and an inspection card comes in the box with guitar.

The glossy green sparkle finish is condensed with only close inspection revealing it.  The maple neck is finished in satin, my personal preference for necks.  Nice and smooth, thin and fast.  

Another of my preferences is smooth fret ends and Galaxie 2s has fret ends are properly tapered and dressed.  You won’t get scraped up traveling up and down the neck playing this guitar.  On the green Galaxie model, the body is mahogany with a dark rosewood fretboard.  The guitar itself has some heft but not boat anchor heavy.  The action was good right out of the box. 

The parts are all nicely finished of quality materials especially the tremolo assembly.  I did notice that the bridge pickup is not sitting level with a light tilt up towards the treble side.  The neck pickup sets level.  Since these guitars are examined and set up before shipping to dealers I found this to be a bit peculiar but I’ve left it alone for now.  There seems to be no lasting effect in regards to tone.  It may have gotten out of whack in the shopping.  It was shipped in a thin cardboard box, which the dealer didn’t seem fit to double box.  (I always do in selling a used guitar, without a case, and they always arrive safely.)


Close up of Galaxie body shape.


The Sound
My first thoughts after plugging it in was how reminiscent the sound was of a Telecaster. But not really.  Using two DiPinto branded single coil pickups, its sound is not as bright as a Tele and there is no twang.  The pickup selections are similar to a Telecaster with a neck, bridge, and then both selected.  So far, my favorite selections are the neck, or the bridge, selected separately, with the neck being my favorite of the two.  For some reason, the neck pickup sounds louder.  On the other hand, the bridge pickup features some nice spank, only to my ear, cleaner without being rawboned.  Both pickups together sound a bit too diffused.
  
Overall, just simple, clean bright tone designed for surf music but I think it can find a home with many different music styles.  I like older stuff like Bluebell and Mr. Sandman and the Galaxie sounds perfect on those tunes.  I’m not a surf music guy but with the clean tones, I’m already getting ideas for all kinds of musical exploration.  

Overall
For me, the Galaxie 2s is real keeper and a pleasant surprise in feel, playability and great tone.  Would love to add another DiPinto in the future if they are going to be this nice.  I hope someday to see a Galaxie 2s in red.  Currently, they are in cream and sunburst finish. 

And if the Galaxie 2s is not your thing, their site offers a dozen different guitars with at least three basses and note that DiPinto guitars are very lefty friendly.  

Maybe to some people DiPinto guitars are deemed to niche instruments.  As with Taylor, all they need is some well known musicians (or soon to be well known) to play these instruments and off they will go.  I do like the fact that it’s a small company that produces these instruments and takes a great deal of care to make sure their guitars go out set up correctly.

Overall, DiPinto guitars offer a great alternative to the Fender/Gibson nexus in regards to affordability, style, and sound.  I hope they can break on thru and be the next great American electric guitar.


Sources

The Site
http://www.dipintoguitars.com/

Interview with Chris DiPinto at NAMM 2010.
http://www.300guitars.com/articles/namm-2010-thats-a-wrap/

2013 interview with Chris DiPinto.
http://fishtownspotlights.com/2013/01/29/dipinto-guitars-chris-dipinto/

Latest interview 2015
http://thekey.xpn.org/2015/07/16/dipinto-guitars-philly/#more-166095