Monday, August 11, 2025

Lame Cherry Blog Bit The Dust

I don’t recall where I discovered the Lame Cherry blog.  Normally I don’t follow blogs where the identity of the blogger is not known. What I did find was a news blog with a totally different, if not constantly conspiratorial, perspective on the news.  At times it read as if the author, or authors were providing insider information.  Who knows, perhaps whistleblowers in intel hate being a part of the skullduggery that goes on within covert operations and took to spewing information to inform the public of how their tax money was actually being spent.  On the other hand, it could just be just another propaganda game. 


Lame Cherry chose a female persona but it is unclear if it really was a woman behind this or a working group of writers.  I’ll use female as a reference in this piece.  After following this blog for years it appeared to me that this was a group effort.  New articles were posted every day, sometimes twice a day.  That’s every day of the year.  And this went on unheeded for many years.  Some articles were quite long and it seemed like quite a stretch for one person to handle the research and writing, which was relentless.  


Whomever it was, the writing style seemed to remain the same over time with Cherry’s usual flaws such as bad grammar, spelling  errors and awkward sentence construction.  Stories were heavy into conspiracy and at times outlandish claims.  Other stories were sensible and properly sourced.  From day to day one never knew which version of Cherry was going to appear, the one with all of her marbles or the other Cherry who had lost them all.  


When some important piece of information was to be shared it was listed as a “matter, antimatter” report, whatever that meant.  The use of racist and antisemitic tropes were used in great abundance.  As was foul language.  Lame Cherry proved herself to be an equal opportunity racist since every race took a hit.  Jews were trashed regularly and women too.  This is why I never recommended it to friends.  


An example of the appearance of insider knowledge was her reworking of the sudden death of Andrew Breitbart, founder of Breitbart News and co-founder of the HuffPost.  His death was reported as a heart attack.  Cherry spun it as an assassination using a binary poison.  Meaning, two inert compounds, safe separately, but when combined becoming a toxic chemical.  There is no proof for this being the actual cause of Breitbart’s death and Cherry is the only source for this.  However, looking deeper, binary poisons, also known as binary chemical agents, have been used in assassinations.  An example is North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un took out his half brother Kim Jong-nam in 2017.


So I assume Lame Cherry is history now  I have never seen a blog totally shutdown on Blogspot before.  Free speech always seemed safe there.  Cherry may have personally shut it down for some unknown reason.  Maybe it really was posting inside baseball on the Powers That Be and they had enough of this exposure.  Or it simply ran its course.  There are plenty of blog sites available to make a comeback if Cherry is up for it.


You can find  Lame Cherry’s past writings at archive.org.  Just type in “Lame Cherry blog” and you’ll find lots to read there.

 

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Jessie Czebotar's False Info In Affidavits

 


Here is an example of what I mentioned earlier regarding false info in Jessie Czebotar's affidavits.  In "LAW ENFORCEMENT GUT PEOPLE ALIVE"she describes her alleged eye witness killing of Lucien Greaves’ (Douglas Misicko) parents and sister by the satanic cabal in 1981.  This is false.  His father Thomas passed away in 2021.  His mother Sylvia and sister Cathy are still alive and listed in the OB.  Also, all three of their first names are wrong, as was the first name of his younger brother (Greg).  She only got Douglas’ name correct in her account of this incident.

She renames everybody else: Parents, Todd (Kilrush) and Sarah.  Siblings, Peter and Alice.  She also has the spelling of the surnames wrong (Mysecko) on all of them. 

Sunday, August 3, 2025

Jessie and Field



Jessie Czebotar’s alleged interaction with Field McConnell.  Two conflicting stories about this incident.  People that know Field said there was no interaction between the two.

Video Link:

https://youtu.be/s1AalswksFQ



Friday, August 1, 2025

Jessie Czebotar Steals Cheryl Beck Testimony

 


Won't be the first time...

The Chaplain is no stranger to stealing the testimonies of others such as Cheryl Beck. In this video at  Wake Up with Miya, starting at timestamp 15 minutes, she stanches Cheryl's "Thumbelina Doll Alter" testimony.  Of which she altered the purpose.  It was created for SRA, not for Project Monarch.

Cheryl posted a rebuttal on the site but host Miya deleted it. Sorry Miya, I won't let you censor this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CS3z_qO3pg


Endnote

Cheryl Beck's interview transcript regarding the "Thumbelina Doll Alter".

https://dannielleblumenthal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/three-interviews-with-cheryl-hersha-beck-pdf.pdf




Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Jessie’s Whacky Call


 

This one is hard to describe.  Jessie Czebotar (see my other articles about her on this blog) made a strange phone call to the police department in Casper, Wyoming trying to get them interested in a child that may have been molested.  Previous to this she had filed a series of actions in a Florida court regarding this issue which all failed since she was filing these cases on her own without the use of an attorney.  She further complicated things by refusing to give her actual address, was unclear regarding her motives and told outlandish stories.


Phone call apparently recorded and released by Czebotar.  


Audio use is under CCL noncommercial usage.


Link:  https://youtu.be/KUXaHta7ZNM

The Chaplain Goes to Medical School


 Not really…

As I have said often, I have yet to watch a Jessie Czebotar video in which she has not told a lie.   Her penchant for deceiving her followers knows no boundaries or is limited by moral conscience. I’ve documented this many times in my blog Outward Trends. Her fanbase never seems to notice or care this deception is being done to them.  Her followers on Twitter continue to grow, their love steady like that from a lover blinded by devotion, oblivious to betrayal. 


Over time, she has begun to manifest contradictions and holes in her backstories.  For example, earlier in 2022 from a video with Carmen Studer Jessie tells the story of attending medical school.  However, in another video with host Adena Hodges at Testimony Mountain she provides the tale again with added modifications and missing parts from the previous outing. 


As can be determined at this juncture, Jessie Czebotar has only attended two colleges. Crown College in Saint Bonifacius, MN and Multnomah College in Portland, OR. Both are Christian schools oriented towards ministry.  


Of the two, only Crown College offers pre-med and nursing.  

She is only claiming one degree, a Masters in Divinity which she obtained in 2010 from Multnomah College.  To enter med school it requires an undergraduate degree.  Then an exam at a medical college which must be passed before actually starting medical school training.


This story already has a multitude of problems.  In the middle of all the schooling is getting married and giving birth to six children.  One would think this task is driven and time consuming enough.  The medical training would have to be jammed in there somewhere, but never clearly defined where.


In the Carmen Studer video she claimed a scholarship for her work in “cloning and DNA” and another one from future CIA director John Brennan in order to finance studying medicine.  She then tells of a run-in with a professor for giving the wrong test in the advanced biology class where eventually she and all 400 students were flunked out and all were given tutors.  


In the Testimony Mountain video she casts aside the cloning story and now states she was interested in animals and was taking veterinary courses (not provided by the two colleges she attended), in which she successfully operated on a pig cadaver’s knee and did such a remarkable job her professor told her she would make a good heart surgeon.  She repeats the incident of the professor run-in but omits the financing for the medical school.  The professor and medical school are still unnamed and no time period is specified.  The work in cloning and genetics is switched out in favor of cutting on pig cadavers.  The various scholarships are missing.  And having a future CIA director providing one of those scholarships is a tall tale indeed (which she can now deny with the Studer video being removed).


Regarding Crown College, what degree, if any she achieved there, is unknown.  She did attend Multnomah College once and a second time was a teacher’s assistant there.  Probably working on her masters there during this time?


Eventually, she feels led by God to pass on being a surgeon, and more inclined to enter ministry.  


Since these stories of hers are contradicting I think it is safe to assume medical school is a fabrication since she can tell the story at least twice (maybe more) but can’t ever name the school.  She also claimed to have a run-in with a professor there, also unnamed.  It’s a bad sign.


Video link showing Jessie Czebotar telling both accounts.  Which one is true?  Mostly likely neither.  Not to mention all of the other unfounded accusations in the video clips.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eiowx_DasxM&t=5s

Thursday, June 19, 2025

An Open Letter to Fredrik Logevall by James DiEugenio

 


An Open Letter to Fredrik Logevall

Written by 

Jim DiEugenio takes Fredrik Logevall to task for his role in both the current Turning Point series on Vietnam and his prior role in the Ken Burns/Lynn Novick series on the subject.

An Open Letter to Fredrik Logevall

Dear Dr. Logevall:

I have just watched all five segments of Turning Point: The Vietnam War. My review appears at the website Kennedys and King.com. I would venture to say it is the longest and most detailed examination of that disappointing series you will find.

I have written or contributed to five books on the JFK case. And I was the screenwriter for Oliver Stone for his two most recent documentaries on that case, JFK Revisited and JFK: Destiny Betrayed. One of the things that puzzled me about Turning Point is that I could not find a writing credit for the series. Because if one is going to do an over six-hour series on such a controversial, multi-faceted, complex subject, it is not wise to just wing it and hope the chips fall into place. And, as we will see, that is not what I think happened here. Let me explain why.

As you must know by now, the series begins with the John Kennedy administration. Which is odd in and of itself. Because America was involved in Vietnam two administrations prior: under Truman and Eisenhower. In other words, for about ten years before JFK was inaugurated. Kennedy inherited the war from those two men.

What this series does is something that is inexplicable. It leads with Kennedy, and spends the whole first segment on him. It then, in Part 2, tells us about what happened in the fifties. In other words, it flashes backwards, referring to something that should have been the lead in. And at that, it is an abbreviated treatment of those ten years. The key development, what actually got this country into Vietnam, was America’s breaking of the Geneva Accords and its installation of the Nhu family as the leaders of the manufactured country of South Vietnam. This was done by President Dwight Eisenhower, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Vice President Richard Nixon. It had been presaged by Dulles’s planning of Operation Vulture to prevent the French collapse at Dien Bien Phu.

There are simply no questions about any of this. America backed the French until the bitter end, and Dulles was willing to use atomic weapons to save the French empire. Dulles then broke his oral agreement at Geneva, i.e., to hold elections and then unify the country. He installed Ngo Dinh Diem as the leader of South Vietnam and kept him in power with rigged elections. This is what started the war under America and caused the rise of the Viet Minh.

To say the film skimps over all this is being much too kind. But it cannot be skimped over, because this was all a monumental miscalculation. Vietnam was never worth using atomic bombs over, and it was not worth creating a new country, led by a man who turned out to be a tyrant. A leader who spoke English, wore Brooks Brothers suits, and had an American styled haircut. This was the true origin of American involvement. And you know this. Because you wrote a book about it called Embers of War.

But as poor as that aspect was, it was not the worst part of Turning Point. Because the film jumped from the fifties to 1965. Let me repeat that: from the fifties to 1965. In other words it skipped over 1964! I could hardly believe what I was witnessing. Why? Because unlike what the film tried to depict, there was no mystery as to how all those American combat troops got into South Vietnam. They arrived there on President Johnson’s orders. And Johnson was planning this expansion of the war and its Americanization throughout 1964. But there was one problem. He had to get elected. So he lied about his planning for America’s direct entry. Some of the people who he had planning for that entry were William Sullivan and Bill Bundy. As Joseph Goulden wrote in his book, Truth is the First Casualty, Sullivan’s first paper on this for LBJ said that this American involvement was necessary in order to halt the advance of the Viet Cong. (p. 88)

But we don’t need Mr. Goulden in order to certify that 1964 was a sea change do we? Because again, you wrote a book on this very subject. It was appropriately titled Choosing War. In other words unlike Kennedy, who stated it was Saigon’s war to win or lose, Johnson was making it America’s war. As you note in your book, two milestones in 1964 made it that way. The first was NSAM 288 which mapped out an air war against the north. The second was planning for a casus belli to get America into the war. This was achieved through the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, which was written before the infamous incident happened, and which Johnson carried around in his suit coat. That was the equivalent of a declaration of war against the north. From there the first American combat troops landed at Da Nang in early 1965, as planned for by Johnson.

When Kennedy was killed there was not one more combat troop in Vietnam than when he took office. Which means there were none. As everyone who has studied the war understands, and as Maxwell Taylor and McGeorge Bundy were explicit about, Kennedy was determined not to commit combat troops into Vietnam. And he did not. Even though, as Gordon Goldstein has shown in his book about Bundy, he was confronted with this proposition nine times. Yet he refused each overture. Johnson did not need to be so encouraged.

You would have been an excellent interview subject for what Johnson did in 1964. Instead you uttered the phrase that Vietnam was not Kennedy’s shining moment. Oh really? Compared to who? Compared to Lyndon Johnson, who started Rolling Thunder and committed a half million ground troops into theater? Or compared to Richard Nixon? Who invaded both Laos and Cambodia; the latter bringing a holocaust to that country. President Nixon also dropped more bomb tonnage over Indochina than Johnson did. Or shall he be compared to Eisenhower; who was going to use atomic weapons at Dien Bien Phu, but he could not get the British to back him on that. Ike also told Kennedy that Laos was worth going to the brink over in Indochina. Thankfully, Kennedy rejected that advice.

I first encountered you and your work through the book Virtual JFK. In the transcripts that make up that volume I thought you were a well informed and objective scholar. You then got involved with Ken Burns and Lynn Novick. They had you do the reply to people like John Newman and David Kaiser and Jamie Galbraith on Kennedy’s withdrawal in the book that accompanied their bloated and utterly mediocre series. Galbraith replied to you on that issue quite strongly and appropriately. Yet you have now repeated that performance. Again, you are part of a film that ignores NSAM 263, the McNamara/Taylor Report, and Johnson’s conscious reversal of Kennedy’s policy. Maybe you did not know what this film was going to be like. After all there does not seem to have been a script. But you sure do know now.

I’d wish you well on your relatively new high profile. But it's not the profile I had imagined for you.

( This letter will be sent directly to the director and one of the producers of Turning Point.)


Source:  https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/an-open-letter-to-fredrik-logevall