Showing posts with label sucks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sucks. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Swart STR-Tweed Amp Review




August 12, 2022 UPDATE

Finally, I did coax some good sounds out of the Swart with a Boss reverb pedal or a MRX delay pedal.  I got the right volume at last, despite how quirky this amp is. After a couple of weeks I went to use the amp again and noticed the volume had dropped off considerably, even when turn up high.  I took off the back panel to see one of the power tubes was barely lit.  So I ordered a replace and once installed, did not fix the volume loss problem.

One day when I can find a reliable amplifier tech I'll have it fixed and then sold.


~0~

Original Review, 2-28-18

Ever notice that it is hard to find reviews of Swart amps online?  Not the corporate ones.  I mean the user reviews. Well, here is one at least.

I recently bought one from a seller on Reverb.com and while Reverb often bugs me to write a review of gear I buy off their site, they have no button available to write a review of my Swart amp purchase.  Nor do they email requesting a review like they do for other purchases.  I see no other reason as to why this option would not be available.  Unless, it is because Swart produces amps of such poor sound quality for such a huge price that negative reviews might affect sales.

This $1,350 amp was almost a return.  First off, besides great build quality, these Swart amps are well known for outstanding, lush spring reverb. I had a hard time getting it to work.  My unit has a quirk where the volume control effects the amount of reverb that is produced.  At first I got reverb that was barely heard.  As an experiment, I cranked the volume knob up to max and then maxed out the reverb and what did I get?  No reverb!   I have owned a lot of amps over the years but never had one where increased volume output deceases the reverb output.  This amp acts like it was wired up by somebody that should be denied access to a soldering gun!

After fiddling with the knobs and Hi/Lo gain switch, I set it to Low and the volume knob set to low.  If I want louder tones I control that from the guitar.  Finally!  Lush tube driven spring reverb from a concert hall to the bottom of a mine shaft.  Too bad this amp, as simple as it is, took so much experimentation just to arrive at its major feature.  Nobody should have to have to go thru this nonsense.  

I am still researching the sound quality, trying different settings, pedals an guitars.  Often it sounds harsh and boxy and is in need of a compressor pedal to balance runaway frequencies.  Overall, it is crude.  Does run quiet enough for recording but hums badly at higher volume levels where tube breakup is supposed to be its other great feature.  In fact, I never got any tube distortion.  The reverb, once you figure out how it works, is the only redeeming value and there is no need to pay over $1,000 for that.

The amp came with no warranty documentation in the box.  Never saw any warranty information on the web site either.  Highly unprofessional to market a product at this price range and not provide the owner with warranty guarantee.  No amp cover either.

I would sell the Swart but I don't want anybody else to be stuck with it.

Ultimately, boutique amps are specialty audio equipment, hand built and wired and priced high to imply something "special" about them since they are built retro.  In this case, superb construction combined with weird features and crude audio hardly ranks as special.  At this price point, there are much better options in the $1,000 or less range.   

Monday, March 16, 2015

Nice Guys Finish Last on Dating Sites

Some of the charming ladies found on dating sites.
Just enter “online dating sucks” in Google and you will get over three million hits.  Very telling, right?  I remember the early days as the Internet took off in popularity, it was real easy to meet women online, back back then (1996) the meeting place was either Usenet newsgroups or pen pal sites.  In fact, most of my internet based relationships (and hence, long distance) were thru a pen pal site, a Christian based one.  It didn’t take long for dating web sites to appear.  

I’ve read that women are so barraged with emails that they can be selective with whom they respond with.  That must be true because I rarely get an email answered.  I realize I am not everybody’s cup of tea but it’s getting to be a total blackout.  I’ve read this is a major complaint from men regarding online dating and the complaint is reflected in their profiles. These days I just sit back and wait for somebody to write me.  I don’t mind waiting weeks for that to happen.  Sending polite messages to women who I think I have a lot in common with and getting nothing but a profile view is gotten to be so frustrating, why bother? 

To back this up, a while back OkCupid listed on profiles what a person’s response rate was.  I was on the site one day and over 20 profiles were listed as, “rarely responds” with just a few women listed as responding back.  They dumped that feature.  Obviously, it’s going to be hard to get paying customers for the upper tier features if they know the response rate is that bad. (See Cupid on Trial below for more on this.) 

Getting a response back is rare it’s a delight when one comes!  You are supposed to write people that you have similar interests with so you can have a conversation starter. Sounds good in theory but in real-world application, forget about it.  It often doesn’t work.  I’ve had women list me in their “favorites” list on PoF which I assume is a sign of interest.  When I’ve written them a nice return message, nothing.  This has happened twice.  What is this, a hobby?  I’ve had women write me and if I was not interested I would send them a polite “not interested” email and I’ve never had a woman do that for me in return.  In my age group they are mostly divorced, mostly aging badly, and in an age group where men are not standing in line for them.  And with all of that, they are unmoved and picky as when they were 21 and considerably more attractive.

The greatest mystery to me is why do some of these women stay on these sites for years on end.  Some women have been sites such as Plenty of Fish for over 6 years with the same profile and with often the same pictures on display.  If this is not working, why stay on a dating site this long?

So the word is out.  Woman basically do not respond to messages sent to them.  

(I should note of late, women are getting picky about who the respond to on pen pal sites as well.  And it’s just platonic friends!)

Farmer’s Only
I have to mention them specifically because they are one of the worst dating sites I’ve ever experienced.  Supposedly set up for isolated rural singles many women don't appear to be that country.  The rural dating site with the down-home TV ads, Farmer’s Only allows for free generic messages to be sent called “flirts.”  I got one once from a CherryB that featured the message, “You email me and I’ll email you back.”  Boy, was I duped!  I paid my $21.95 (now six dollars more) and sent a regular intro message to this lady and waited.  And waited some more.  Never got a response.  I emailed her one more time, a polite message to see what happened, and no more response from her.  True, she may have had a change of heart, but I kept feeling it was a fake message sent to spur me into buying a membership.  It’s quite possible this woman had no interest in me and site’s code generated the flirt message to inspire me to pay up.  If so, it worked.  But it will never happen again.  (Of note, CherryB’s profile is still on there after over a year with the same picture on display.  It’s unclear if this is a real profile or not.  In January of this year the site was showing she viewed my profile on a day when I visited the site and never saw the visit posted then, or many days afterward.  The view has since disappeared and then showed her again viewing my profile at around 2 AM in February.  Then disappeared again.  Wonky code at work.)

I got off the site seven months ago but recently got back on to see any new trends on the site (oh, and your profile is never deleted once you leave, it’s stored on their server forever).  Nothing has changed except it’s more expensive.  The site design is as cruddy and minimally featured as usual.  The coding seems to be in a state of decay as information will disappear and then reappear a few days later.  I had one person’s visit to my profile, email notice, and “like” notice disappear.  She may have left the site.  People will be listed as having viewed your profile on days when you were on and never noticed them, or they might disappear, the end result of a poorly coded database of what is going on regarding your profile on the web site. Or, just coded for false traffic.  Also, many of the members that were there over a year ago were still there with the same pictures on display (this is true on other sites too--some women on Plenty of Fish have the same pictures up from 6-7 years ago).  Other members appear to live on the site 24 hours a day or are shown to be on the site at odd times of the day when they should be at work.  

Many people complain of being ripped off by Farmer’s Only, being billed for memberships they don’t want and not getting a refund when requested.  What is really happening is that if you pay for one month of membership it’s turned on thereafter.  A user has to go the “Manage your Subscription” section under the Account Settings and turn it off.  Or else, your card will be billed  in perpetuity.  So watch the fine print. 

(Also, foreign ISP’s are blocked. So don’t try to access the site during international travel.) 

UPDATE:  Farmer’s Only now blurs over profiles of everybody that views your profile, ‘like’ messages, or sends an email.  Where is the incentive to being a paying member to see who is checking you out or sending a message?  Another authoritarian move from this outfit.  My account there is closed...again...final.

Cupid On Trial
Jon Millward’s blog posted a revealing article in June of 2012 regarding a test he conducted, using dummy profiles on OkCupid to test the success that men and women might receive there (click HERE).  Photos were selected of five women and five men all of differing degrees of attractiveness.  All were caucasian.  At least a few were overweight.  All of the profiles had generic information posted about each person.  No messages sent to the dummy accounts were ever answered. 
      
The results were interesting.  Women got a (not surprising) far larger response.  In 24 hours, the women got a total of 90 hits.  The men got 2 hits and those went to one man only.  Ouch!  After 7 days the women’s responses outnumbered the men 17 to 1.  And at least three of the men received no messages at all.  One of the women got 236 emails.  The second highest was 128. 

So there you have it gentlemen, this little experiment confirms the sum of our fears regarding dating sites.  They rarely write back if you write them.  There are no minorities in the test so it’s unknown how different the results might be if they were included.  

However, their summery of the data doesn’t make sense.  As stated:  “In the end men and women probably do have it about equal, it’s just a bit different for each.”

That statement contradicts the data presented.  A 17 to 1 ratio and it’s about equal?  I think not.  Obviously, women have it much easier getting contacts from men, at least on OkCupid.  The data presented, if accurate, should scare off any man from being a paying member.  

Profiles
I cannot comment in regards to men’s profiles on dating sites so I don’t know what women go thru except for reading about dishonest, nutty, or over-sexed men contacting them.  

Many women are setting themselves up for failure.  Some profiles are written up to show a nice person there, even if that sweet heart is filled with romantic notions she should have discarded after getting past the age of thirty or the first divorce.  Others are Nurse Ratchets, bitter and bossy.  The Nurse Ratchets demand that a man chew his food with his mouth closed; bath more than once a week; not lick his fingers at the table; brush his teeth often and so on.  As if the only available men just emerged from the stone age.  Yes, computer literate cave men.

Some women are hung up about looks.  Remember where you have landed ladies...on a dating site on the internet.  Your chances of meeting a real, live man in real life, is dim.  Men are deemed shallow if they discount a woman in regards to her appearance, in particular weight (and let it be noted that women are the harshest judges of beauty of other women).  Yet woman are very comfortable in their shallow view of men.  They hate beards, baldness, weight, height (a biggie), and a whole host of other physical features.  

Other women narrow the field of available men by demanding they have similar interests.  Such as golfing, horse riding, motorcycle riding, jogging and so on.  Nurse Ratchet will say, “If you don’t golf, don’t bother emailing me.”  I certainly hope they don’t complain later about not being able to meet men online if only golfers are in the running.  The act as if they want a male copy of themselves.  Nothing better than me, than another me!

Blossoms
Cherry Blossoms is a site where there is a lot of action for men.  The only catch is the women are mostly Filipinas and they are mostly impoverished, and they are all too far away.  They tend to be aggressive and sent out emails to anybody of any age group.  Even 18-year-old girls throw themselves at men of any age.  If you are in your 50s or 60s and want a teenage child-bride there is the place to go.  As opposed to American women, these girls will mostly answer emails so most men should have no trouble getting in contact with women there.  Just remember what you are getting into.

I’ve heard the Filipinas make good wives but one has to precede with caution with Asian women.  Many are ready to hook up with any man of any age to get out of the grinding poverty in the Philippines.  A man will need to get a passport, travel over there, and then pay and apply for a fiancee visa.  And wait it out.

The Chinese women are quite beautiful, mostly well educated and seem to have good English skills.  They are friendly and will generally answer emails. But I noticed that most of their profile photos are all professionally done.  Being a photographer I know professional lighting and backdrops when I see them.  I suspect this is a red flag.  There is a huge male to female ratio in China so I wonder why they would be on a dating site, unless they have a preference for western men.  Seriously, it would be a good avenue to send agents over here to gather information.  Don’t laugh...intelligence agencies employ all kinds of data gathering assets.

So There You Have It
Good luck!  It’s a jungle out there with false profiles, false traffic to trick you into to paying up, women who don’t for a multitude of reasons don’t or won’t reply to emails, to women who do and the whole thing runs out of steam before you can even meet them.  I just basically try to write up a good profile that attracts interest and let them write me.  They do in time.

To be fair, online dating isn’t good for men or women.  I’ve read lots of stories about women dealing with sex obsessed males that hit women up for a romp only, which is a total turn off.  Many men have severe personal issues from criminal backgrounds to drug abuse and lie to cover up a shady past.  Some men have issues with women and go on these sites to take cheap shots at them.  

Most men should understand when trying to contact women on these sites that you are not going to be everybody’s cup of tea.  It’s only after a while that you realize that you are nobody’s cup of tea!

So, precede with caution.  You might get lucky.

Update  4.2.15
Ended my accounts on Plenty of Fish, Okcupid, and Farmer's only.  What a good feeling!  I have found it's easier to meet women on pen pal sites.  None local but they are as a group, much friendlier than women on dating sites.  You can actually meet somebody to have a conversation with.  Maybe that is because they are not Americans?


Update  4.2.15
Though I had decided to not to get on these single sites again, low and behold, I was tempted to try Our Time after seeing the ads.  I found quickly, it's the same old song and dance.  The same flood of apparently false traffic, local users viewing my profile at odd hours of the night (two local women at 3 AM?  Please...), added to lots of favorite lists, and other nonsense.  Badly coded site as well, though not as bad as Farmer's Only.  Every time I login I'm told I have 9 minutes to sign up now.  Got back in an hour and the same countdown start all over again.  Pressure to pay up? Not like that. That should play once for one login, not off and on all day.




Sources

Cupid On Trial

http://jonmillward.com/blog/attraction-dating/cupid-on-trial-a-4-month-online-dating-experiment/

Online Dating Sucks For Men Because Of Women Like Me

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Satellite Broadband–Only For The Lonely


If you are too far off the beaten path and need something better than dial-up just about your only option is broadband via satellite.  That is my issue living out in the country on property my grandfather purchased and farmed 80 years ago.  And it's not a very good option either due largely to inconsistent performance issues and frankly, is only for people that need the speed and need to keep up with things.  I got it because I needed the speed for uploading my stock photos to various agencies I sell through.  What follows is my experiences with one provider, Wildblue, over a 6-year period.

The Set Up
Hopefully the installer will do a good job or else you'll get off to a glitchy start.  Fundamentally, it all works as advertised.  Until stuff happens.  One thing is weather.  A dark cloud and and sometimes even a moderate rain can lose the lock.  As the storm passes it will reacquire the signal.  However, another problem is the central gateway, located elsewhere around the country can lose the lock for you if they have weather problems in their location.  Since I am on beam 45, my gateway is Lorado, Texas.  A storm front there and here I am here in Florida with a cloudless sky and there goes my internet.

Sometimes the net will slow to a crawl.  I don't know what causes it other than a network issue on Wildblue's end but I have a fix for it.  To reboot the modem.  And how do you reboot a satellite modem?  Pull the plug out of the socket, wait a fe minutes and plug it back in.  Hows that for hi-tech?  Nothing like living in a modern age, huh?  Apparently, the engineers thought the satellite lock would be so solid as to rarely get lost.  So there is no on/off switch or reset button.  The trouble is a loss of the lock happens so often, plus other glitches that might occur, that the unplugging and plugging is almost a daily occurrence.  It gets old quick.  I solved some of this frustration by getting separate, dedicated, power strip.  It's got an on/off switch on it.  Imagine that!

Anyway, it works for most matters.  The service goes through phases of being spot-on and running rock-solid and other periods of utter frustration, poor quality and ineptitude.  One day recently I had to reboot the modem 5 times.  The next day, none.  The problems encountered are everything from pages not loading with a host of error messages (101, 103, 105...) with are mostly network related; slow loading of pages, pages with most of the graphics missing and pages that never load.  I've seen the satellite lock lost in a heavy downpour and at other times staying connected through the worst of rain squalls.  Anything and all conditions are possible.  I've seen it all including equipment failure requiring a modem and parts replacement.

On the other hand, my satellite TV and radio work so much better than satellite broadband.  A recent tropical storm which featured 5 days of rain, the TV only lost lock once and the XM radio, never.  In my experience both are light years ahead in terms of quality and reliance.

FAP'd!
FAP, the Fair Access Policy.  The was instituted so overuse of the bandwidth would slow down the speed for everybody.  A good idea in theory but it's like a death sentence hanging over one's head.  Will just one more download from iTunes do me in?  It's done as a rolling 30-day usage which I've never understood but I think it reflects what the usage was thirty days previously.  It’s a confusing method of calculation and I never know where I stand with it.  Some people have called it a “magic formula” and that is basically correct.  A competitor, HughesNet, has limits but loosens them up for late-night unlimited downloading from 1-6 AM, EST.  (Also, basic service is $10 cheaper per month and use KU BAND service for access during bad weather.)

(A word to Mac users, it might be wise to turn off the automatic downloading of software updates, no matter how important this feature is because your data usage can expand quickly out of control.  Especially if more than one Mac is on the pipeline.)

I've been FAP'd twice before.  Once you get past your 75% data threshold your speed is cut.  The first time I was uploading too many video clips to one of my online stock photo sites.  When this happens they back your speed off to dialup speeds.  I admit it was my own fault for not paying attention to my usage.  However, when Wildblue sent me the email that I was being FAP’d, they stated that since I had violated their policy I was being "punished."  Yes, they actually use the word "punished" in the email they sent me.  Imagine saying such a thing to a customer that is paying $50 a month for your service!  They don’t do that anymore because at this writing, I’ve got my FAP notice again.  Apparently, that 1.3 gig Mac OS updated did it plus a few other updates.  This second time has been the worst as they backed me so far off that most web sites would not load at all.  I got a host of 101, 103, 105 and 107 error codes.  The first time I could at least load a page.  This time virtually nothing.  It was as if I was placed in a sub dial-up mode.  Even my Earthlink dial-up, which I had to use during this time was faster and more reliable than this Wildblue slow-down.  I can understand lowering the data rate but this just about shuts off all web access.  Pretty nasty and uncalled for.

Regardless, it can take a few days to a week to get regular rates back up to normal again.

6 Years On
Nothing about the quality of satellite broadband service has ever gotten any better in quality over the past 6 years.  It's as glitchy as it ever was.  Signal drop-outs are common and nothing much has been done to correct this and other issues associated with the service.  It's all stuck back in time.  I've maintained a dial-up account with Earthlink and I'm glad I did as I've had to use it many times.  It's ironic that the old fashioned dial-up is so reliable–slow but reliable.  The Fair Access Policy has changed little over the years except to rename it a DAP–Data Allowance Police.  allowing users more leeway in managing it, or for that matter, understanding it.  At least the monthly service charge has remained the same. I’ve read that Wildblue has a newer faster system but that require a new dish and modem called Excede.  I doubt I will be spending any more money with them in the future and if you read the customer comments on Wildblue’s forum (http://wildblueworld.com/forum/) you will not find very many happy users there and it’s a classic tale of the pioneers getting all the arrows, or in this case, glitches.

Finally...
Finally, 3G is in available in my area now and it's the next phase for me.  I haven't tried it yet but I have read the speed is much better and the basic service cost for broadband with Verizon is just $30 a month.  It’s a two year commitment though.  It has a FAP but your speeds are not reduced for going over your monthly allotment.  Instead, the user is just charged more per data packet.

So if you are far out in the boonies and need internet access faster than dial-up just remember what I've written here and what you can expect to deal with.  Your milage may vary of course, but be prepared with a back up dial-up account and a separate power strip.


Addendum  7.3.12
Did make the leap to Verizon 3G via Mobile Hotspot wi-fi.  It's awesome!  Way faster than Wildblue's basic service, no dropouts and it works when it's raining.  Lightning fast! Youtube video's run steady with no stop and starts.  Pages rip down in seconds. Verizon has a package deal for the Interent and wi-fi phone for around $69.95 a month.  Highly recommended for all folks living out in the country.