The Q Bot

The Qanon phenomenon took the internet by storm just after Donald Trump’s inauguration in 2017.  An unnamed entity or group, started posting cryptic messages on a site called 8chan.   A whole online industry sprung up to quote and decode the “Q” postings.  The mainstream media claims Q is a right wing conspiracy monger while conservatives feel Q is working with Trump. 

One popular Q post is “Still with the plan.”  What plan?  It is never defined.  That doesn’t stop people from quoting it on social media.  It’s a symbol for hope.  One that is rarely questioned about what the plan is supposed to be.  It is quite apparent that people recognize there are two types of justice.  One for the insiders and the other for outsiders with   the insiders never paying for their crimes.  Q pretends to offer light at the end of the tunnel.  

Besides being vague, many Q posts are questions that are never answered or news events one can read anywhere.  What is released is public domain, declassified information.  Anybody with a browser can find the same thing.  Since none of the postings are classified why the secrecy as to who Q is?  Because Q is psyop on the Real People that make America great.  The Powers That Be (Deep State, etc.) are deftly afraid of the People.  The People are armed.  Millions of them and that stands in the way of their aims.  Many people are aware that the Mainstream media sources are just corporate propaganda outlets for the Overlords and have plenty of online sources to find out what is really going on.

Q’s main purpose then, is to keep these armed citizens from open rebellion against the growing out reach of tyranny.  Keep them complacent and cowed waiting for Q to feed them the good news about how they are winning.  Feed them enough vague but hopeful messages such as this recent one, “The next few weeks will demonstrate our resolve. WWG1WGA!!! Q” and “As the darkness falls so does our enemies. Q”.  These common postings of Q are meant to stave off a rising up of the public.  To let them know things are going well and the White Hats are fighting back.

But by whom?  Patriots inside the Deep State?  Trump’s people?  More mysteries and shadows.  This type of Q rhetoric has been going on for years.  And so far, it has worked.  And what has changed?  The only change is we are currently living in a nightmare dystopian world of nightly riots, destruction of public and private property, virus lockdowns and the coming Global Reset in January of 2021.  None of which, Q ever predicted.  

In many ways Q posts are closely akin to Nostradamus Quatrains where the real meaning of the prophecies are  known till after a forecasted event takes place. If that.  Q will post older entries after a notable event takes place.  Sort of a “See I told ya!” Which leaves the faithful amazed with Q’s insights. Yes, Q was right again! 

On another tangent the mainstream propaganda outlets refer to the Q as a “right wing conspiracy” movement.  What is the conspiracy?  They never say.  The spend a lot of copy space attacking Q in many liberal publications.  Why bother?  What threat is Q to them?  The only conspiracy I found was when Q lost its IP 8chan and moved to 8kun, the propaganda outlets refused to list the new ULR.  It’s .top.  Dozens of liberal to leftist leaning sites made note of the change but never mentioned this important part of the ULR which one can search and easily find. It shows how in lock step they all are.  They did a lousy job covering this up.  Obviously, journalism is not about telling the public what they really know.   

A more interesting conspiracy is by Miles Mathis in his article, What Is A Parallel?  Mathis is a big-time conspiracy writer with side interests in art and physics.  A “parallel”  is an intelligence operation where a patsy is used to mimic an intended target.  It is a way of attacking someone by way of stealth and discrediting them or a whole movement.  The goal is not to attack the targeted person directly, but indirectly through someone that has similar ideas, statements, etc., as the target with the hope of when the pasty falls so does the intended victim.  Very clever!  

Mathis goes on to state his belief that Qanon is the parallel for him.  He cites this in an Atlantic Monthly article entitled, “How Q-Anon is warping reality and discrediting science.”  Mathis rightly points out that Q has nothing to do with science or discrediting it.  Must have been inserted as a teaser, but lame.  As far as “warping reality” goes the mainstream media under control of various intel agencies has been doing that for many decades.  Just read the Atlantic’s article, or any article of theirs or anywhere else in the mainstream to experience their alternate take on reality.  

Meanwhile the geeks at Langley are laughing their asses off reading the hopeful social media posts by the faithful Q followers.  When Q posts a picture of a watch and pen, the faithful spend hours trying to decipher what it means.  A metaphor regarding time running out for the Deep State?  The pen that will sign the declassification order?  So far, not the case at all.  

In 2018 the FBI listed Q as a domestic terrorist threat.  Kind of funny considering how Q posts are are not threatening in the least, announce no plans for overthrow of the government, nor promote dangerous threats to public officials.  Q is never telling the Patriots to arm up and get ready for war. As already stated, Q posts are too vague to mean much of anything.  Miles Mathis thinks Q is a CIA/FBI project. I tend to agree.  Qanon then, operates as a manufactured enemy of the deep state. That is probably as close to the truth as we will get.  Q can only tell the True Believers to follow the “Plan” for so long till it crashes and burns.  Such as being told to follow Jeff Sessions as AG and we know how that turned out.

Are you people really going to trust the word of somebody or some group whose real name you do not know?  

Notes

7/21/20

Former CIA agent Kevin Shipp posted the following on Twitter this morning:

“The, "Great Awakening" is real and inspiring to many. I fully support it. Q anons must continue their expose's and strengthen the movement. I must caution them of this: Q, which started as a legitimate insider, has been taken over on 8Kun. It is now a PsyOp.”

This is laughable!  All opinion mixed with BS.  As I stated above, there is no “insider” 

information in Q posts.  It is all public domain, declassified information.  Sorry, Mr. Shipp it was a psyop from day one.  Ironic to read this coming from someone that makes a career and out of deception.  And by the way, the Qanon crowd is not very trustful of CIA types, retired or active.

As far as Qanon being taken over by 8Kun, where is the source on that?  There is none.  Name somebody or group.  There is none.

7/18/20
The Miles Mathis’s article on “What Is A Parallel?” is probably one of the best articles available regarding what Qanon is all about.  Highly recommended.  

While the notion that the media is controlled by the CIA and other intelligence agencies may seem like yet another conspiracy theory, the congressional testimony of former CIA director William Colby is notable for him stating that anybody of any importance in the media is controlled by the CIA.  It still is.  Don’t trust, but verify everything you read online.  Do your own research to sort out the truth.

Sources

http://mileswmathis.com/lafrance.pdf

Q posts

https://qmap.pub

Clavius is a Spook Site

Home page on Clavius.org

Clavis, known as Moon Base Clavius  from the moon base on them movie 2001, is a debunking web site for the critics and theorists of the Apollo moon landings. As it states on the home page, “Moon Base Clavius is an organization of amateurs and professionals devoted to the Apollo program and its manned exploration of the moon. Our special mission is to debunk the so-called conspiracy theories that state such a landing may never have occurred.”

While it is loaded with useful information regarding the landings, technologies used and so forth, I felt something was slightly off with Clavious when I first starting checking it out.  Digging deeper I found this web site to be a total mystery as who created it and maintains it. The site does list a webmaster, Jay Windley, who claims to have training in engineering but never worked for NASA.  His bio does not state he authored any of the articles on Clavious nor is he listed as the owner of the web site.  The articles, while well written, do not feature any author names or copyrights.  There are no external links to sources used. There is no advertising, so no visible means of financial support.  Also, a Whois search has the ULR ownership unlisted.  Very odd, particularly if you want interested readers to take your seriously.

These are all the hallmarks of a intelligence agency operation. There are no authors, no sources, no copyrights and no monetization.  Why all the mystery?  Why no transparency as to who they are?  

Clavius reminds me of Snopes.  Snopes, supposedly a site for debunking urban myths, gives enough data to prove their point and ignores the difficult details that do not.  For example on Clavius, the Radiation Primer page has very useful information regarding radiation energies and effects.  It lists materials that are radiation blocking and some that are not.  However, it ignores the fact that those shielding materials are not present in the construction of the Apollo Command Module and the Lunar Landing Module.  Both are largely constructed of aluminum, a very poor radiation blocker.  But the reader is never informed of this.

Another radiation issue, the Van Allen radiation belts, the dangers are dealt with in typical fashion.  As stated, “And the Apollo navigators plotted a course through the thinnest parts of the belts and arranged for the spacecraft to pass through them quickly, limiting the exposure.”  

Apparently the anonymous author didn’t read Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman’s book, “Countdown” where on pages 203-204, he states they went through the thickest parts of the belts and only got the equivalent exposure of a chest x-ray.  No fancy flying here!  They just went head-on through the belts with little trouble.  Borman goes on to add, “So much for the dire predictions some scientists had made about harmful, perhaps fatal, exposure to the belt.”  Borman is dismissing the radiation hazard as being an over rated threat.

So who is lying here, Frank Borman or the anonymous writers at Clavius?

Likewise, there is no mention of plotting trajectories to avoid the harmful parts of the Van Allen belts in any NASA tech docs that I have read, nor is it ever mentioned in the transcripts of astronaut conversations.  They did a 5 minute burn for a “free return trajectory” to escape earth’s gravitational field and other than some minor course corrections, they sped on to enter the moon’s gravitational field.  No warping thru radiation densities as Frank Borman states in his book or in his follow-up book Apollo 8, co-written with 

The treatment of critics of the Apollo moon program are abysmal.  They are always referred to as “conspiracy theorists,” a term invented as a talking point by the CIA to discredit the critics of the Kennedy assassination investigation in press reports. Now it is used to attack critics of official Government accounts of everything from JFK to the 911 attacks. The anonymous writers at Clavius use this term repeatedly, implying there are no anomalies in the Apollo program, just a bunch of know-nothing conspiracy kooks.  That of course is not true.  Aulis.com has articles written by scientists and engineers who question effectively, many elements of the Apollo moon program.

So reader beware.