My latest post at my Substack. Part one of my trip to Tikal in 1998.
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgebailey/p/tikal-to-teotihuacan-part-1
My latest post at my Substack. Part one of my trip to Tikal in 1998.
https://open.substack.com/pub/georgebailey/p/tikal-to-teotihuacan-part-1
One of Cathy Fox's amateurish memes. |
Blogger Cathy Fox (fake name, fake picture, fake sex) has taken upon himself to attack truth seekers like myself and others online and in his demented side blog Scarletsage. So here are a compendium of articles on Jessie Czebotar’s ongoing fraud. You will see the facts, with screen captures and video clips of what myself and other seekers are trying to warn the public about.
And by the way, like many of his irrational claims, his allegations of us attacking him for 3 years is nonsense. Just an excuse to justify his attacks on me, Sarah Moch, Grey, Paula Blades and other researchers. He was never our focus. Czebotar’s continued deceptions always will be.
And the other allegation that we attack SRA survivors is also nonsense (Jessie doesn’t count) as evidenced by so many survivors that follow us on X. They know we speak the truth and have compassion for them.
I have never debated him on his outrageous and slanderous claims and instead decided to let the facts present themselves. Besides, anybody that calls my blog Outward Trends— Outright Turds is not a person one can have a reasonable adult conversation with let alone, someone who tries to insult and discredit others with nonsense while not having the courage to show his face.
Jessie Czebotar is not who she claims to be.
Jessie article links:
https://georgebailey.substack.com/p/the-outward-trends-compendium
Attack on Grey Area Monarch
The reason these Jessie coverup squad attacks us is because we challenge Jessie’s narrative and in effect her business operations.
In this wild example of Mr. Fox taking Grey out of context, and out of reason, he spins the yarn that Grey is admitting to the use of female persona in sock accounts. None of this can be seen in Grey’s tweets. He is referring to a man, Brad Conley who admits to using a female persona.
Here is how you can research these issues if you come under attack by these Players.
Go here to X’s deep search: https://twitter.com/search-advanced
Type: female. In accounts type: @GreyAreaMonarch
Date type: 9/1/24 - 9/30/24
Then you will see how Fox misused the proper context of Grey’s tweets, and how his rebuttal makes no sense at all, as if he is reading something else entirely different. He uses about a dozen of Grey’s tweets and misinterprets all of them in this manner.
A bit sensitive about this Mr. Fox? After all, it's not far from what you are doing with your online persona!
10.21.24
Here is an attack piece Mr. Fox did on me for calling Jessie Czebotar’s ministry partner and ferocious defender, Marion Altena a “terrorist.”
Here is just one example of this towards me:
So I call her a terrorist due to this behavior. And obviously so.
There is no pretending to be morally upright. I am. I am not pretending to be a woman online. I make no accusations that are false--I use facts such as images, videos, links, etc. Mr. Fox is weird, claiming we have attacked him for three years. He was never our focus. Jessie was.
Here is my video on Marion Altena and her outrageous and rude behavior towards people online.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5haDbOoSN8&t=14s
11.16.24
Here are some samples. I could fill many pages with this drek:
Well, look there! No sooner than I made the post about Fox's buddy Ally posting links to his attack blog, he landed with another smear piece. Mr. Fox is getting to be as constant a stalker as Marion is. It's the usual nonsense against me of alleged lies and psyops. He can’t seem to come up with anything new.
Whoever he is, he must have a load of hate in him to carry on like this.
I wonder if Mr. Fox is a solo operator? Seems to post his blogs or his two Telegram channels every day, 7 days a week, including holidays. Who has this much time or content? We (myself and other people he's attacked) never have figured out what the audience is for something like this. The attacks are so outlandish and goofy as not to be taken seriously. The traffic? I can’t find the sage site in a search anymore. Just companies selling plants and seeds. Lol.
The idea that the surname Bailey is connected to "satanic bloodlines" stems from fringe conspiracy theories, notably popularized by Fritz Springmeier in his book Bloodlines of the Illuminati. Springmeier claims the Bailey family is a generational satanic bloodline involved in globalist agendas, citing their alleged ties to banking, politics, and institutions like the Royal Institute for International Affairs. These claims are largely based on speculation, anecdotal connections, and unverified assertions, lacking credible historical or genealogical evidence.
Historically, the Bailey surname has Anglo-Norman origins, derived from the term "bailli" (bailiff or steward), tied to roles in medieval governance or fortifications. It’s a common surname, ranking among the top 100 in English-speaking countries, with no inherent link to occult or conspiratorial activities.
Conspiracy theories like Springmeier’s often exploit common surnames to weave narratives of elite control, but they lack substantiation and rely on selective storytelling. For instance, the Baileys are mentioned alongside prominent families like the Kennedys or Collins, but these connections are superficial and not uniquely indicative of any "satanic" agenda. Critics of these theories, including mainstream historians and genealogists, dismiss them as unfounded, noting the absence of primary sources or verifiable records. Springmeier’s own credibility is further questioned due to his conviction for armed robbery, which casts doubt on his reliability as a researcher.
On the other hand, some proponents of these theories argue that the Bailey family’s historical involvement in British peerage (e.g., Barons of Glanusk) or globalist institutions suggests hidden influence. They point to figures like Sir Abe Bailey, a financier linked to the Round Table movement, as evidence of elite connections. However, these are standard historical associations for wealthy families of the era and don’t imply anything supernatural or conspiratorial.
In short, there’s no credible evidence linking the Bailey surname to "satanic bloodlines." The theory appears to be a speculative narrative built on loose associations, not facts. If you’re researching family history, genealogical resources like FamilySearch or 23andMe can provide concrete data about the Bailey lineage without the conspiratorial lens.
6.27.25
From Mr. Fox (typo included):
"Bailey carried out an unacknowledged edit, called a stealth edit. Highly dishonest behaviour. He deleted a significant question without acknowledgement or apology.
The text that Bailey replaced it with was equally, if not even more absurd claiming that Jessie and Somerset Belenoff’s blogs were owned by the same company. They were not, but I have already covered that 6 month psyop that Bailey ran. If he ever claims it is not a psyop, he has to admit to utter stupidity and poor research that lasted for 6 months. Here is a summary… Bailey Knock Knock Psyop Part 7 - The Controlled Drama Queen's Deceptive "Correction" [SSBB12].”
I will admit I did make a mistake regarding Jessie’s website and the fake Somerset Belenoff’s website being owned by the same company. I did in fact post an apology at the end of my article “The Queen of the Illuminati Somerset Belenoff, in Endnote 9.14.21.
He lies. He has to lie to call me a liar.
Mr. Fox in his overzealousness to defame my character has left out the important point that I did admit to the mistake and apologized to my readers for this error. He usually has an element of dishonesty in his character, lots of lying, in his charges. Even in this case, considering he stalks my blog postings and apparently copies the text to make comparison studies for more attack material, he totally ignores this point.
I do not double down like Jessie and her defenders and cult members do.
7.1.25
To clarify, regarding Fox's missing castle falsehood (Château des Amerois), the missing castle is the Laurie Cabot Kent castle, which Jessie said was the location of the now famous "three girls picture" location. And I clearly stated this in my post, The Picture Does Not Lie.
He knows what he is doing. Jessie's groupies will never double check and read the article.