Awkward Document For NASA Regarding GCR

 

Screen shot from Space Radiation and Risks to Human Health.

When browsing through NASA’s documents every so often one finds statements that do not fit the official account.  And they don’t seem to mind the contractions.   

The document “Space Radiation and Risks to Human Health” by Janice L. Huff, Ph.D., is a case in point.  She is the  Deputy Element Scientist at the NASA Space Radiation Program and this report can be found on NASA’s technical report server. 

What caught my eye was the obvious contradiction regarding the hazards of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and no data to evaluate human health hazards.  Ironically, one of the highlighted bullet points (see above) states there is no shielding that can block GCR.  So if the Apollo astronauts went to the moon, they would have been barraged with the cosmic rays since their capsule’s shielding would not have blocked the rays.  Should they not have the human data? 

GCR also fragments into secondary high energy particles that can as the report states, “damage biomolecules, cells and tissues.”  An illustration shows the rays passing thru a human head.

Interesting how the NASA experts know about cell and tissue damage when they say they have no human data on the health hazards to reply upon.  How do they know this?  Another bullet point is professing the need for more animal experimentation.  Which apparently they haven’t done enough of, if any.

As I wrote in my article “NASA Document Implies No Go To The Moon,” NASA has no misgiving in mocking their own narrative.  In that document from their report server, a chart indicates that the sum total of Apollo radiation exposure for all missions was the same as the Space Shuttle which never left low earth orbit.  The astronaut’s dosimeter readings were the same as being in low earth orbit as well.  The highest exposure goes to the ISS.  Yet if they actually did the moon landings they are being bathed in galactic cosmic rays for the duration of the trip to the moon, on the surface during the exploration phase, and back home again.  The consequences should have been hazardous to the health and cognitive function of the astronauts and eventually, deadly. 

Besides GCR the astronauts would have been exposed to a plethora of radiation both in sis lunar space and on the moon’s surface.  Alpha, Beta, Gamma radiation as well as microwave, x-rays, etc.  These same energies would affect astronauts on the moon as well and in another odd twist, there was no adequate shielding in the suit to block all of these high energy particles.  The weak point being the helmet which was made entirely out of plastic and offered no shielding from the radiation nor any insolation from the extreme heat and cold.  

Did NASA use black budget technology in the shielding?  Unknown.  If not, then we are looking at a con job.

Sources

Space Radiation and Risks to Human Health 

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140005866

NASA Document Implies No Go To The Moon

http://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2018/09/nasa-document-implies-no-go-to-moon.html

The Right Stuff Is Right This Time

Dragon Astronaut exiting capsule on August 2, 2020

It was a great day in manned space flight to see astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley slash down in the Gulf of Mexico on the afternoon of August 2.  The first time in 45 years that such an event had occurred.  The astronauts had launched from the cape on May 30 and had spent 63 days on the International Space Station.

In my article The Right Stuff Never Stumbles, I document how the Russian cosmonauts and space tourists could not remove themselves from the capsule upon landing or walking. They had to carted off the field due to the effects of being in zero (micro) gravity.  Meanwhile, the Gemini and Apollo astronauts had no issues with this at all, regarding any of their flights and landings.  One of the longest missions, Gemini 7 spent 14 days in space with astronauts James Lovell and Frank Borman.  They could extract themselves from their capsules and freely walk about minutes after landing.  

So I watched with great interest to see if the Behnken and Hurley would leave the capsule on their own or be helped out.  The rescue personnel helped both of the astronauts out of the dragon and sent them off on stretchers.  I was delighted to see this.  It proves the Dragon trip to the ISS actually happened.  In the era of Deep Fakes it is nice to see some reality for a change.  

But the success of the SpaceX/NASA Dragon does point to the phoniness of the of the NASA missions of the 1960’s and 70’s.  As stated in the Right Stuff article, the space tourists and Russian Cosmonauts could not walk upon landing due to the physical effects on the body in a weightless environment.  Micro gravity, meaning no gravity, is very harmful to the human body and gives one a since of being tremendously heavy upon return.  This is never experienced by any astronaut from the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs.  You can witness them getting out of the capsule on their own with no help and then freely walking around afterward. 

So Sunday’s splashdown points to more evidence of NASA Cold War myth making.

The Right Stuff Never Stumbles

https://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-right-stuff-never-stumbles.html

Anousheh Ansari’s Blog - Engineer and space tourist describes the effects of after space recovery.

http://spaceblog.xprize.org/2006/10/05/second-birth/

Lunar Geology and Ionizing Radiation

Over at Aulis, a report on lunar radiation has been posted, Lunar Geology and Ionizing Radiationby Bulcsu Siklós, PhD.  This report serves as a devastating rebuttal to the official NASA narrative of landing men on the moon.  Namely, that the radiation on the moon’s surface is too deadly and the Apollo crews did not have sufficient shielding to survive in the lunar environment. 

LINK for the Dr. Siklós report.

Links to my articles on this subject:

NASA Document Implies No Go To The Moon

Technical report showing Apollo Astronauts for all missions, only experienced the radiation exposure of low earth orbit.  

http://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2018/09/nasa-document-implies-no-go-to-moon.html

Book Review:  Spacesuit—Fashioning Apollo by Nicholas de Monchau.  A detailed account of spacesuit development that totally ignores radiation shielding in the suit.  Because there is none.

https://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2019/07/book-review-fashioning-apollo-by.html